Skip to content

What if Dennis Rodman isn’t all that wrong?

Sep 17, 2013, 4:03 PM EDT


This Dennis Rodman saga just keeps getting more and more unbelievable. Unless you live under a rock and/or are otherwise disconnected from modern technology, you’ve heard at least something about the former Bulls forward’s North Korean activities backed by Irish oddsmakers Paddy Power, PLC.

Not only has the guy visited North Korea twice, referring to dictator Kim Jong-un as “a very good guy“, he is now saying he plans to return in January to host two exhibition games with former NBA players. He calls it “basketball diplomacy”, indicating at least some knowledge of Nixon’s 1971 ping-pong diplomacy campaigns between the U.S. and China in the midst of the Cold War.

The media is having a field day: here is one of the most colorful (literally, too) players in NBA history, financed by Irish bookies, cozying up to the world’s most brutal dictatorship, then showing up to the press conference in classic Rodman fashion complete with cigar, booze*, chains, oversized shades, and more piercings than I can count. Ridiculous, wouldn’t you say?

But here’s the thing – what if Rodman isn’t so wrong? Beyond all the media hoopla, what if somehow, someway, this ridiculous drama thaws the ice-cold tension with the North Korean regime? Personally, I think it’s a slim chance at best. BUT, consider this: Dennis Rodman isn’t flying solo. He and Paddy Power have the support of the independent non-profit NGO International Crisis Group, whose stated objective is to prevent and resolve deadly conflict. Dr. Daniel Pinkston directs the North East Asia arm of the ICG, and spoke at Rodman’s press conference. Earlier that day, Pinkston published his reasoning for why “basketball diplomacy” could work.  An excerpt:

“The Rodman visit was very important to [North Korean] leadership. Kim Jong-un snubbed former US presidents and other heads of state, as well as a former high-level US government official and the executive chairman of Google, but Kim turned out for Rodman and appeared giddy as they sat next to each other and watched the game.  …

The Rodman visit is subversive because the image of Kim embracing Rodman can be perceived as the leadership tolerating or accepting someone who is different. South Korea’s Daily NK reported that North Koreans in the provinces were stunned to see Kim embracing an American with numerous tattoos and body piercings and likened it to Kim embracing a ‘goblin or gangster’.  …

North Korea’s leaders want their system to survive, and any changes they make are intended to strengthen the system, not to reform it. They have learned from Gorbachev’s ‘mistakes’ of seeking political reforms and restructuring to improve the Soviet system. The North Korean leadership apparently views sport exchanges as furthering its own agenda.  …

However, ‘basketball diplomacy’ could have unintended consequences for the regime, just as Gorbachev’s perestroika did for the USSR and the lifting of travel restrictions did for East Germany. Personal exchanges are probably the best way to expose North Koreans to different types of governance and social organisation, which is the first step in the thought process that results in questioning the regime.”  (see Pinkston)

Basically, Pinkston says that before North Korea can change, we must make inroads into the North Korean thought process. Dennis Rodman represents a new approach, an attempt to breach the norm and create a measure of goodwill. Who’s to say if it will go smoothly – the North Korean regime is erratic and unpredictable, and events could spiral wildly out of control.** Rodman & Co. might be right, might be wrong. But Paddy Power and the International Crisis Group have a very good point: in order to make positive change, the door must first open. It’s just curious this is who they chose to try it.


* Visible as he makes his entrance at the 6:20 mark.

** Example: Dennis & Kim.  (Sounds like it could be the name of Comedy Central’s next big thing)

  1. cbking05 - Sep 17, 2013 at 4:20 PM

    I think Kim wants to F**K Rodman or vice versa ….not vice versa as in Rodman wants to F**k Kim…Vice Versa as in Kim wants in the arse … but hey if that would bring peace and harmony then more power to Rodman

  2. antistratfordian - Sep 17, 2013 at 4:33 PM

    “what if Rodman isn’t so wrong?”

    When did anyone say that Rodman was wrong about anything? North Korea needs all the exposure it can get.

    • Rhett Anderson - Sep 17, 2013 at 5:17 PM

      George Stephanopoulos, for one: A quick google search will give you a couple dozen others. It’s more than fair to say that most people agree with the mainstream media’s portrayal of Rodman as “lunatic”, “crazy”, “unhinged”, and a dozen other words in this case synonymous with “wrong”. So yes, many people have said he is “wrong”.

      • antistratfordian - Sep 17, 2013 at 6:53 PM

        But if someone thinks Rodman is “foolish” (like Stephanopoulos) that doesn’t necessarily mean that he thinks Rodman is “wrong” in a moral sense.

        I cannot find many articles suggesting that he is immoral – though I’m sure they are out there somewhere. That is where I was coming from.

    • badintent - Sep 19, 2013 at 2:48 AM

      Exposure ?? Like Bubba Cllinton going there with knee pads on to get Al Gore’s TV network hoes out of the pen ? How is that better than what Rodman is doing ? I agree with Rodman’s opinion of Obama’s wetboy approach to getting another publicity seeker out of jail.When you go to North Korea legally or sneaking in , you don’t take photos with a camera or cell phone.Or you go to jail.

      Why would Rodman with some tats and nose rinks be more of a lunatic than John Kennedy who was high on cortisone/amphetamine shots all the time and screwing Russia spies in London Hotels ?? More power to Dennis. The haters and critics are jealous that he got play with Carmen Electra and they just got Playboy pics of her.

  3. frankahilario - Sep 17, 2013 at 5:26 PM

    If you don’t believe that Dennis Rodman is insane, you are.

  4. psly2124 - Sep 17, 2013 at 5:52 PM

    Why wouldn’t this liberal owned site want to love a communist dictator who starves his people. The ends justifies the means. What every good liberal believes, that’s why they love dictators like Obama, Stalin and the rest of the communists.

  5. cwk22 - Sep 17, 2013 at 9:24 PM

    Giving any chance to show he is a legitimate leader just lets the world know what an idiot rodman is. No one should write about him at all.

  6. fm31970 - Sep 17, 2013 at 10:53 PM

    There’s something very genuine about Rodman, despite his continual desire to put on a show. His HOF(?) speech from a few months ago gave us a good glimpse at what he’s really like, underneath the persona. Like Charles Barkley and Jose Canseco, he speaks his mind honestly and without a filter, and what comes out make pretty good sense to people who are willing to put aside their own bias and listen to what’s said. I’m not saying he should be a U.S. Ambassador, but his trips to North Korea might turn out to have a great value to millions of people. Maybe not, too, only time will tell, but it’s clear he’s not doing any harm, and the fact that he can get that personal with KJu probably ticks a lot of politically connected people off. Either way, keep doing what you do, Dennis.

  7. 00maltliquor - Sep 18, 2013 at 1:39 AM

    I like this new guy Rhett and his writing style.

    Somehow though, I get the feeling KJI has no knowledge of the Worm’s past in drag, as the picture in the link shows.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Top 10 NBA Player Searches
  1. D. Rose (2121)
  2. K. Irving (1715)
  3. A. Davis (1603)
  4. R. Rubio (1555)
  5. L. James (1515)
  1. K. Durant (1509)
  2. K. Bryant (1462)
  3. T. Thompson (1277)
  4. J. Clarkson (1224)
  5. A. Aminu (1167)