Sep 4, 2013, 12:12 AM EST
The short answer to the Michael Beasley question in Los Angeles should be a resounding “no,” for a variety of reasons. But believe it or not, the case can be made, so let’s break down exactly why it’s unlikely that the Lakers would bother to pursue the talented but troubled forward who was waived by the Suns on Tuesday.
Beasley’s struggles away from basketball make him toxic to add to any team right now, but as always has been the case, he’s intriguing from a pure talent standpoint, especially to a Lakers team looking to emphasize offense and that has holes at the small forward position.
Getting Beasley at the minimum for 2013-14 would not only allow the team to keep the financial flexibility for next summer that it so covets, but it would give Mike D’Antoni another offensive weapon to work with. This is a guy who has a career high of 42 points, a guy who once put up 22 points and 15 rebounds in a playoff game, a guy who has a 34.5 percent career mark from 3, but has shot 36.6 percent or better from deep in three out of his five career seasons. …
However, style of play wise, L.A. could be perfect for him. Not only are D’Antoni’s open-court sets suited for his game, but Beasley had his best season as a professional while coached by Lakers assistant Kurt Rambis when he was the head coach in Minnesota in 2010-11.
All of that is true about Beasley, of course, but the primary issue with him is never addressed when smart NBA people only observe him from afar.
A scout from another NBA team nailed the Beasley problem perfectly when speaking to Randy Hill of Fox Sports Arizona.
“I guess, from a talent standpoint, it made sense,” an advance scout employed by another NBA team said of bringing in Beasley. “The money wasn’t all that prohibitive, really, and the guy has had some big moments scoring the ball. All of the peripheral stuff … I can’t say anything about that. I just watch what he does on the floor — things that go beyond the numbers.”
What types of things?
“Well, for the most part … he’s just not engaged all that often away from the ball,” the scout said. “At both ends, his focus drifts and it just kills what his team is trying to accomplish … whether it’s rotating or closing out in time or with effort on defense or making a hard cut on offense. He has the physical tools to succeed but rarely plays with a fire. Even when he has the ball, you can see that in how he tries to finish at the basket.”
And that’s it exactly.
It isn’t that Beasley can’t do the things that made him a desirable NBA talent anymore; it’s that he won’t. There’s no passion, fire, or consistent high level of play associated with his game that make him worth taking any type of risk any longer.
The Lakers just signed Shawne Williams, and in doing so already took a chance on a player that flamed out of the league. Don’t expect them to now pursue Beasley, who has struggled with the same issues that derailed the career of Williams, and has had them occur far more recently.
- PBT’s weekly NBA Power Rankings: Santa brings Warriors top spot, lump of coal for Knicks 6
- Clippers, Mavericks, Rockets and Kings reportedly interested in signing Josh Smith 12
- Pistons release Josh Smith. WHAT? 52
- Lakers may give Kobe Bryant some nights off to rest. If he wants them. 27
- PBT’s Sunday Night Winners/Losers: Anthony Davis is playing like an MVP 13
- Sources: Kings prefer George Karl, not serious about hiring Mark Jackson 8
- Nuggets Danilo Gallinari has meniscus tear in right knee, out three weeks after surgery 7
- Rajon Rondo was very Rondoesque in debut with Mavericks (VIDEO) 20