Aug 29, 2013, 12:22 AM EDT
There are issues with the Bucks signing Larry Sanders to a long-term, four-year, $44 million contract extension, but overall it’s probably not a terrible decision.
Sanders has been accused of mailing it in at times, and was among the leaders in technical fouls last season, tying for third with Blake Griffin and Carmelo Anthony, and finishing behind only DeMarcus Cousins and Russell Westbrook for the most in the league.
But Sanders is talented, and the price paid for a player possessing his skill set is anything but outrageous. It’s the going rate, in fact, but there was a time very recently when the team’s management wasn’t convinced that Sanders should be the future face of the franchise.
Larry Sanders ascent to being Bucks’ highest paid player is remarkable. A yr ago some Bucks officials wanted to cut him.
That’s a bold statement, considering that Sanders is now on the books for guaranteed money longer than any other player on the Milwaukee roster.
But to be honest, the Bucks didn’t have much of a choice.
NBA teams can’t continually attempt to rebuild, and at some point they need to establish credibility by retaining the players that give a star-level effort who are already in place.
Sanders has the inherent ability, and if he truly is able to fix his problem with the officials, Milwaukee has a special player in place. It’s crazy that front office personnel were ready to bail on him as recently as last summer, but unfortunately, that’s the nature of the business.
- Five top candidates for NBA Rookie of the Year 18
- NBA GMs surveyed predict LeBron will win MVP, Spurs will repeat as champions 27
- Owners vote down NBA Draft lottery reform, system to stay same for this season 45
- ProBasketballTalk 2014-15 preview: Houston Rockets 24
- Kobe Bryant responds to ESPN article with basically a shrug (VIDEO) 20
- Paul George refutes report he didn’t want to play with Kobe Bryant: ‘Media reaching again’ 22
- PBT Extra preview: Lakers, Celtics big name teams headed to lottery 12
- Could lottery reform be bad for small market teams? Sam Presti argues yes. 23