Jul 19, 2013, 8:00 AM EDT
NBA teams were operating under uncertainty entering the 2010-11 season. The Collective Bargaining Agreement was scheduled to expire the next summer, and there was no telling what terms the new deal would include.
Teams might have to drastically shed salary to get under a hard cap. Trade exceptions could expire during a lockout. Existing contracts could change.
Besides the usual risks that come with transactions, there were plenty of ways teams’ decisions could backfire simply via the upcoming negotiating process between the owners and players.
But it seemed the Thunder signing Kevin Durant to a five-year, maximum contract extension in 2010 couldn’t go wrong. In his third year, Durant had just made the All-NBA first team, and his future seemed bright. Durant capitalized on that momentum, making another All-NBA first team in 2010-11 as the NBA headed into the lockout.
Durant’s extension didn’t call for a set dollar amount. Rather, it just specified he’d make a maximum salary. That max salary for players like Durant changed dramatically from the previous CBA to current edition thanks to what’s often called the Derrick Rose Rule. Durant, because he had made two All-NBA teams, was eligible for a larger extension than other players coming off their rookie-scale deal.
Suddenly, the Thunder were on the hook for $89,163,134 rather than $74,302,616 for the next five years based on the new rule structure, but still using the current Basketball Related Income split between players owners. The difference: $14,860,519.
Too late to change those outcomes, the Thunder had their protest answered by the NBA.
Zach Lowe of Grantland:
Darnell Mayberry of The Oklahoman:
This sets a dangerous precedent, and frankly, I’m surprised the owners approved it. The Thunder certainly weren’t the only team who made a decision the new CBA adversely affected. When do teams that paid a steeper luxury tax as specified by the new CBA get their handout?
Durant – whose take-home salary won’t be affected by this vote – will also be eligible to make more on his next contract because of this rule. Can Oklahoma City ask for money from the rest of the league then, too?
By not altering the Thunder’s team salary – i.e., not changing their luxury-tax bill – and not reimbursing the full $14,860,519, the other owners didn’t take as large as step as they could have. But they still took a huge leap. Probably too large of one.
- Report: Wes Matthews reaches agreement to join Dallas Mavericks 0
- PBT Extra: Five best free agent signings in the first days of free agency 7
- Dwyane Wade agrees to one-year, $20 million deal to stay with Heat 53
- PBT Podcast: Talking best signings of free agency so far 0
- Report: Pacers agree to four-year, $44 million contract with Monta Ellis 22
- Report: Greg Monroe signing a maximum contract with Bucks 56
- Lakers, Knicks struggle on hectic first day of free agency 64
- Trail Blazers assistant coach: ‘We didn’t publicize it, but we lost LaMarcus Aldridge’ 9