May 6, 2013, 8:44 AM EDT
LeBron James received 120 of the 121 first place votes for MVP — he was one vote short of being the first ever unanimous pick.
The person who cast the lone dissenting vote was the very good, very well respected NBA writer for the Boston Globe Gary Washburn, who defended his vote Monday in the paper.
Secondly, this isn’t the Best Player in the Game award, it’s the Most Valuable Player award, and I think what Anthony accomplished this season was worthy of my vote. He led the Knicks to their first division title in 19 years.
That’s a long time ago.
Anthony led the league in scoring average and basically carried an old Knicks team to the No. 2 seed in the Eastern Conference. Amar’e Stoudemire missed most of the season with knee issues, Raymond Felton missed six weeks, and Tyson Chandler dealt with nagging injuries, leaving Anthony, J.R. Smith, and a bunch of lottery picks from the mid-1990s to win 54 games and beat the Miami Heat three times.
This is a fair argument, and while not one I fully agree with he certainly is within his bounds to make it and cast that vote. It’s not like Washburn voted for J.J. Hickson or something, Anthony came in third and was a legitimate MVP candidate. Frankly, I’d rather hear the explanation of the nine voters who left Anthony out of their top five completely.
And the league intentionally does not define MVP for the voters — you can vote for the best player in the game, the guy you think who was most important to his team, the best player on the best team, or however else you wish to define most valuable. I think for most voters this definition is more art than science — they know what the MVP is when they see it. And it’s a combination of all those definitions.
The idea that the league or anyone else didn’t want LeBron to be unanimous is bunk — for one Washburn is not the kind of guy swayed by that stuff. He voted his conscience.
I think LeBron deserved it for a tremendous season lifting a good team to the best record in the NBA, to a level where they won 27 in a row and were dominant. To me Anthony had his best season ever, however, and will agree that without him this Knicks roster is in a lot of trouble this past season. And remember, the votes are for the regular season — Anthony’s playoff struggles (against defenses overloaded to stop him) do not matter in the voting.
Just like people often say with politics, I don’t agree with Washburn’s vote but I’ll defend his right to cast it.
But this makes you wonder about past voting — Michael Jordan was never unanimous? Kareem Abdul-Jabbar? Wilt Chamberlain? Washburn is not Fred Hickman (the broadcaster’s one vote in 2000 cost Shaquille O’Neal a unanimous win, Hickman voted for Allen Iverson) he was a guy voting what he saw and believed.
And he had the courage to defend it publicly. Good on him. Now we can all move on to the games and things that really matter in basketball.
- Pau Gasol says Kobe was right to rip Lakers front office 10
- It’s confirmed: Phil Jackson returns to Knicks to head up front office, revive franchise 22
- Kevin Durant: Kobe Bryant and Michael Jordan are greatest of all time 60
- LeBron James becomes Obamacare pitchman 38
- Report: Houston Rockets to pursue Carmelo Anthony this summer 31