Apr 23, 2013, 1:05 PM EST
Game 1 of the Celtics vs. Knicks played to form — the Celtics’ physical and aggressive defense made it hard for the Knicks to score, but Boston struggled even more on offense putting up just 8 points in the fourth quarter and falling 85-78.
But for the Celtics there was one real reason to be positive — their defense set the tone for the game. They took the Knicks out of their game, but the Celtics couldn’t capitalize. Boston is counting on its defense to do that again, and to combine that with an offensive spark from Kevin Garnett (and maybe the bench would be nice) to even the series.
And a win for either side would be huge — if this series heads back to Boston for Game 3 tied 1-1 we could be in for a full seven-game slugfest. If the Knicks go up 2-0 Boston will have to find a way to win 4-of-5 to get the series, and that seems daunting. At best.
Boston is going to try and get their offense by establishing Kevin Garnett early and often — he had 8 points on 4-of-12 shooting in Game 1. In Game 2 the Celtics want to go to him first and work inside-out in the half-court. With the Knicks able to throw the size and defense of Tyson Chandler at KG, Boston is going to need counters — and they are going to need floor-spacing shooters to knock down shots and open the floor up. As a team the Celtics were 5-of-20 from three in Game 1. Paul Pierce was 1-of-7, Jason Terry 0-of-4. Shoot like that again and the results will be the same on the scoreboard.
Terry and Courtney Lee in general have to be better than a combined 0-for-7 for four points. Those two were a mess. Boston isn’t deep, Doc Rivers doesn’t have a lot of options, he needs these guys to play.
Also, the Celtics will need another appearance by the aggressive Jeff Green that had 26 points. If he has a “good game, invisible game” pattern the Celtics are in a lot of trouble. And they already don’t have much martin for error.
The Knicks need to get back to ball movement and floor spacing they had during their win streak near the end of the season.
In Game 1 the Celtics and their aggressive defense did a good job of taking away the Knicks first option off the pick-and-roll — Garnett and other bigs showed out and cut off Raymond Felton’s drives and the team’s recovery and rotations closed off passing lanes.
When their first option went away, the Knicks seemed to have no Plan B. They just gave it to Carmelo Anthony or J.R. Smith and had them create largely in isolation. And Anthony was 7-of-21 shooting in isolation sets, Smith 5-for-14 according to Hoopchalk.
The return of crafty guard Pablo Prigioni from an ankle sprain should help with the ball movement. So should a better conditioned Tyson Chandler (remember he missed 16 of the Knicks last 20 before Game 1, and the rust showed). Chandler is a great roll man, if the Knick set their picks high enough he should create space as he rolls in. And if the ball swings better to shooters the Knicks will have better looks.
We know about the defenses in this series — Boston is always good, the Knicks can play solid ball when Chandler is healthy. What the Knicks had were options in Game 1 — Chandler struggled but Kenyon Martin stepped up in the paint. We’ll see if the Celtics have the options to counter.
- Home-court advantage means less than ever in NBA. Why? 2
- Nikola Mirotic’s unique style rewarding Bulls for waiting on him 10
- What We Learned in NBA Tuesday Night: Bulls fans should want more of this attacking Derrick Rose 10
- Derrick Rose hits step-back jumper in overtime, lifts Bulls past Warriors (VIDEO) 5
- It’s official: Zach LaVine, Greek Freak Antetokounmpo headline All-Star Dunk Contest 11
- Report: Stephen Curry, Klay Thompson to participate in All-Star weekend’s Three-Point Contest 8
- Three Things We Learned from NBA Monday: Is it time to mention Anthony Davis with LeBron and Durant? 35
- PBT Extra: Who should be the All-Star Game reserves? 18