Comments on: Bucks GM says trade for Redick is about winning now, but it’s also about something else

By: fm31970

fm31970 — Sun, 24 Feb 2013 07:54:49 +0000

Ummmm, 2011 – #1 seed Spurs ousted by the 8th seeded Grizzlies in Round One?

They’d probably get swept by the Heat, but the Knicks, I’m not so sure.

By: Mr. Wright 212

Mr. Wright 212 — Sun, 24 Feb 2013 01:45:27 +0000

They wouldn’t beat the Heat or Knicks (or Pacers/Bulls, if the Knicks’ blip on the radar turned out to be more than the fluke that it is) in a seven game series, so the original verbiage was correct.

By: fanofevilempire

fanofevilempire — Sat, 23 Feb 2013 22:37:13 +0000

winning what now?

By: mazblast

mazblast — Sat, 23 Feb 2013 20:50:05 +0000

“and along with it a first round exit”

Shouldn’t that be “a PROBABLE first round exit”? Or do you have access to David Stern’s list of who he’d “prefer” to see winning the various matchups?

By: onbucky96

onbucky96 — Sat, 23 Feb 2013 19:30:24 +0000

Its about getting people to show up. Bradley Center has lots of good seats still availible…

By: money2long

money2long — Sat, 23 Feb 2013 19:22:18 +0000

i don’t know who the bucks were going to part with in a trade for josh smith, but if they were able to retain jennings, ellis and sanders to team with smith, that team woulda been cool to see.