Skip to content

Are the Milwaukee Bucks interested in Josh Smith?

Feb 16, 2013, 4:24 PM EDT

San Antonio Spurs v Atlanta Hawks Getty Images

The Milwaukee Bucks have the potential to be one of the biggest players at the trade deadline.

They have one of the league’s best shooters on an affordable deal in Mike Dunleavy. They have a serviceable backup big man on an expiring deal in Samuel Dalembert. They have point guard Brandon Jennings, who will be a restricted free agent this offseason, and Monta Ellis, who has one year remaining on his deal. And for a team looking for a piece that’s locked in, you could do worse than Ersan Ilyasova as a stretch four.

The Bucks have the assets and the cap relief necessary to acquire a big piece. Could that piece be Josh Smith?

One team that hasn’t been publicly mentioned in the Smith Sweepstakes is Milwaukee, although there are whispers the Bucks are interested. The Bucks are in position to offer the Hawks as good of a deal as anyone for Smith, especially if Jennings or Ellis is involved. Bucks forward Ersan Ilyasova, whom the Nets seriously courted during free agency last summer and are still interested in, could also come into play.

Via Gery Woelfel | Racine Journal Times

The big question here is whether Milwaukee thinks they have a legitimate shot at keeping Josh Smith beyond the next few months. Smith has been an Atlanta guy his whole life, and going from hot to cold on another team that’s a middling contender in the Eastern Conference might not be the most attractive situation. Jennings and Ellis aren’t exactly the type of guards that big men are lining up to play with, either.

While Smith may not be a candidate to stick around in Milwaukee, the Bucks could stand to do something with their big expiring contracts (Dalembert, Beno Udrih) for once instead of simply letting them expire. Unlikely to be a player in free agency, this may be the time to try and acquire a valuable piece.

For Atlanta, they’d need to decide whether Ersan Ilyasova is worth his contract. They don’t need Jennings (I like Teague better, personally) and Lou Williams should be able to recover from his season ending injury and do a lot of the same things Monta Ellis does for half the price. That leaves Ilyasova and his 5 year/$45 million dollar deal as the probable exchange for Smith, which probably doesn’t fall in line with Atlanta’s rebuilding process.

The Bucks could offer something along the lines of Udrih/Dalembert/John Henson and draft picks, which would probably be more appealing for Atlanta. Again though, it’s hard to see Milwaukee making a deal like that unless they thought Smith would re-sign with them.

These could just be whispers and nothing more, but Atlanta and Milwaukee certainly seem like two teams in position to make a move before Thursday’s deadline.

  1. 00maltliquor - Feb 16, 2013 at 5:48 PM

    Somebody just make a big trade already!! I’m tired of waiting!

  2. sdemp - Feb 16, 2013 at 5:56 PM

    Milwaukee already has 2 guards that don’t want to be in Milwaukee, why would they even entertain the idea of bringing in a guy, I mean boy that has bashed Milwaukee in the past.

  3. dondada10 - Feb 16, 2013 at 6:04 PM

    Jennings > Teague. Not even close.

    • D.J. Foster - Feb 16, 2013 at 6:09 PM

      Probably closer than you think. Look at the per36 numbers:

      http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pcm_finder.cgi?request=1&sum=1&p1=teaguje01&y1=2013&p2=jennibr01&y2=2013

  4. paintman34 - Feb 16, 2013 at 7:20 PM

    If Teague got Jennings touches, I’m pretty sure his numbers would be the same if not better. Also, If I’m Atlanta, I ask for Larry Sanders so you can get a defensive anchor and you’d be able to move Horford to PF

  5. Kevin S. - Feb 16, 2013 at 7:25 PM

    If Milwaukee’s willing to pay him $94 million for the next five years of his career, Josh Smith will be more than willing to re-sign. Can’t see why a team with actual budgetary constraints would do that, though. That’s probably the biggest reason why the Nets are still in on Smith, the fact that they’re the only team that should be willing to treat Smith as more than a rental.

  6. aldavis4president - Feb 16, 2013 at 9:24 PM

    LOL @ TAKING TEAGUE OVER JENNINGS!! that’s a joke comment bro.

  7. fm31970 - Feb 16, 2013 at 11:06 PM

    Please, John Hammond, don’t trade for Smith, and whatever you do KEEP Larry Sanders! Finally a draft pick pans out (though he’s now injured with back issues, but he was playing very well), so let’s keep him around.

    I also don’t think letting expiring contracts expire is the worst thing, either. It’s always better than taking back someone else’s garbage in trade, and more often than not it involves being stuck with that player(s) for more than two years. Stop the endless cycle, Bucks. Trade Jennings for draft picks, let Ellis’ contract expire after next year (or deal him, if possible), and start anew with the guards.

    Also, Illyasova is the #2 player they need to keep. He’s on a fairly priced contract and backed it up with his play. No way should they trade him, even for an expiring contract.

  8. siege102 - Feb 17, 2013 at 2:10 AM

    People, Larry Sanders is untouchable. In fact, he is the only Milwaukee Buck that isn’t on the market as we type.

  9. scott46 - Feb 17, 2013 at 5:33 PM

    I like the acquisition of Josh Smith, but I would only give up Ilysova & Dalembert or Ellis & Dalembert and maybe throw in first round draft pick… I have been saying for years Milwaukee is soft and weak inside and will continue to lose as they have the last 4 years. Smith stops the bleeding…

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

Will LeBron get booed Christmas Day in Miami?
Top 10 NBA Player Searches
  1. K. Love (3661)
  2. D. Rose (2913)
  3. K. Bryant (2557)
  4. L. James (2489)
  5. K. Irving (2244)
  1. T. Young (2042)
  2. A. Davis (2020)
  3. R. Allen (1858)
  4. S. Marion (1764)
  5. E. Okafor (1697)