Skip to content

The Extra Pass: The Eric Bledsoe Predicament

Feb 6, 2013, 9:05 AM EDT

Eric Bledsoe Clippers Getty Images

Los Angeles Clippers guard Eric Bledsoe is one great big problem.

He’s a problem for opponents who have to bring the ball up against him. He’s a problem for big men that think they’ll safely collect rebounds. He’s a problem for the backpedaling guard in transition that has to stay in front of him.

He’s a problem for his coach. He’s better suited to play shooting guard, but he’s 6-foot-1 and shoots a set-shot. So he’s a point guard, but not really. But he’s fast. Too fast. 

Bledsoe is such a problem that now he’s a problem for the entire organization. The secret is out, and other teams want Bledsoe to be their problem.

And here’s where it gets tricky for the Clippers. Head coach Vinny Del Negro views Eric Bledsoe as a point guard, and playing behind the league’s best point guard, he is a backup and little more. To wit, Bledsoe and Paul have played a measly 138 minutes together on the season. For comparison sake, Paul has played 588 minutes next to uninspiring wingman Willie Green.

That’s a problem. The Clippers aren’t maximizing Bledsoe’s value — they’re just using him as one heck of an insurance policy. With Chris Paul in a suit on the sidelines, that looks smart. With Chris Paul being an unrestricted free agent this offseason and not committed long-term, it looks even smarter. Sure, Paul has every reason to stay — more money, winning team, big market — but until it’s on paper, the Clippers can’t build off assumptions.

That’s really the heart of the issue surrounding the trade rumors for Bledsoe. He’s worth more as a player to other teams, but he’s worth more as an asset to the Clippers. Bledsoe is simultaneously the backup plan and the future in that he’s the most desirable, cheapest and realistic trade asset on the team by a large margin.

Pushing all-in for a Kevin Garnett is enticing, but KG isn’t a more valuable asset to the Clippers than Bledsoe is. Don’t get that confused. Garnett is the better player even at 36-years-old, and I’m incredibly comfortable saying a deal involving Butler and Bledsoe for Garnett would make the Clippers better, maybe even so much so that it would vault them to a championship. But moving Bledsoe for a guy on the other side of the hill could also shorten the window to win that championship dramatically and perhaps unnecessarily.

There’s a flip side to that, though. Paul is desperate for a championship and wants to win now more than anything else, and Del Negro is on a one-year deal and hunting for a long-term contract. Chris Paul barely plays with Bledsoe — you don’t think he’d rather have a big man setting the world’s dirtiest screens to free him up instead? You don’t think Del Negro would feel more confident with his coaching career in the hands of one of the greatest defensive players and floor spacers the game has ever seen rather than Lamar Odom and DeAndre Jordan? Moving  Bledsoe doesn’t seem so bad if your length of vision matches the length of your contract.

Still, trading Bledsoe for another veteran assumes an awful lot of risk moving forward outside of Paul’s impending decision. Chauncey Billups, Grant Hill, Lamar Odom, Caron Butler, Matt Barnes — spring chickens they are not. At some point, you have to look at the roster Paul would be coming back to and make sure it’s one that can succeed long-term. Bledsoe is essentially acting as money in the Clippers’ saving account. He’s there for an emergency, but he’s also there to buy a bigger future asset the Clippers would have limited means to acquire otherwise.

This year’s trade deadline doesn’t have to be a boom or bust situation for the Clippers. Bledsoe will still be under contract next year, and it’s hard to imagine he won’t continue to improve. The market for his services is only going to grow.

And really, aren’t the Clippers a legitimate title contender already? This is a team that went an entire month without a loss when they were near full-strength. Adding an aging veteran with title experience that’s already on the roster (Billups) to that group instead of forfeiting current and future contributors for an outside guy is certainly safer, and it’s probably a little smarter, too.

  1. readysethike - Feb 6, 2013 at 9:31 AM

    they are not trading bledsoe this season so get over it…

  2. nbascreed - Feb 6, 2013 at 9:39 AM

    It’s only a predictament if you subscribe to anachronic “he must be a, b and c to be a 1” or “he must do x, y and z to be a 2” thinking, as evinced here. Bledsoe is a player with immense physical talents. He gets after opposing guard defensively and flies up and down the court.

  3. timb12 - Feb 6, 2013 at 9:50 AM

    You are your skill set.

  4. mat9844 - Feb 6, 2013 at 9:58 AM

    Reads like the opening pages of a hard-to-sell novel.

  5. yousuxxors - Feb 6, 2013 at 12:51 PM

    he should start at the 2

  6. colincb - Feb 6, 2013 at 1:02 PM

    A) The Clippers are not a legitimate contender already as they are proving in Chris Paul’s absence.

    B) Boston wouldn’t trade KG for what would for them be also a back-up PG as well and a 3rd string SF. A better deal assuming the Celtics are in blow-up mode would be EB and LO (an expiring contract who’s useless to either team) and a 1st. I don’t think Boston’s in blow-up mode, however, and this trade also doesn’t help them win in the next 2-3 years.

    C) KG is still an All-Star and, whether he deserves it or not, he’s a helluva lot closer to being an elite player than Bledsoe. He certainly would make the Clippers a title contender for the next three playoffs.

    • Kurt Helin - Feb 6, 2013 at 5:44 PM

      I would like you to take the best player off any team and tell me they are still a contender. The Bulls have done as well as anyone and they are not a contender without Rose.

  7. eugenesaxe - Feb 6, 2013 at 1:24 PM

    Gotta keep him until you know Paul’s status, fortunately they have that option. After that…He can bring in a nice haul from someone.

  8. dko83 - Feb 6, 2013 at 2:41 PM

    Clippers players have a great chance to win the whole thing. Unfortunately for them, Vinny Del Negro doesn’t.

  9. opshuns - Feb 6, 2013 at 5:40 PM

    I would rather have Bledsoe than Garnett. Garnett is taller but I honestly don’t believe he is not as good a player as Bledsoe. Bledsoe has some serious hops…I just have this feeling that Garnett would mess with the chemistry…imo…

  10. bougin89 - Feb 6, 2013 at 6:06 PM

    I really wish the Bucks could package some players to get him but we don’t have enough/the right pieces to give to get him. I don’t think Bledsoe gets traded until the offseason anyway.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Top 10 NBA Player Searches
  1. D. Rose (2536)
  2. K. Irving (1987)
  3. L. James (1665)
  4. A. Davis (1611)
  5. K. Bryant (1593)