Dec 18, 2012, 11:59 AM EDT
As we debated whether or not the Celtics should bring back the band for one more run or break it up and start to rebuild, one question we never discussed was “are the Celtics a veteran team?” Because it seems obvious.
But Celtics coach Doc Rivers doesn’t see it that way.
“Where I think people get mixed up, there’s a difference between a veteran team and a lot of veterans on a team,” Rivers said. “This is not a veteran team. This team hasn’t been together.”
I’m not buying it. It’s a matter of semantics, but I’m on the other side.
In the economics of today’s NBA, you’re not going to get teams like the 1980s Celtics where maybe a few fringe players change but even the role guys stick in the same spot year after year after year. That’s not how it works (it wasn’t even how it worked then, exactly).
A veteran team now has a core that has been together for years and rotate role players who buy in around it. Think Spurs.
Also think Boston. They are veteran at their core. Kevin Garnett, Paul Pierce and Rajon Rondo are the core and they have been together for a long time. Yes, they have to fit in Jeff Green and Jason Terry and the soon-to-return Avery Bradley, but every team is moving role players a lot in the off-season. To me the core of Boston is veteran and the other guys just need to buy in and play.
They are just not playing all that well right now.
- Report: Mo Williams signing with Cavaliers for most of their MLE 18
- Report: Cavaliers, Clippers discussing Jamal Crawford for Brendan Haywood trade 26
- Reports: David West agrees to veteran minimum deal to play for Spurs 76
- Report: Marc Gasol, Grizzlies reach deal on five-year, $110 million contract 9
- Manu Ginobili tweets he’ll play next season 5
- Who is left: 15 best free agents still on the board 14
- Report: Detroit Pistons sign restricted free agent Reggie Jackson for five-years, $80 million 38
- Report: Lakers near deal to sign Brandon Bass, may trade Nick Young 36