<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PBT Podcast: Talking Lakers, Warriors, All-Star voting, and a chat with Kenny Anderson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/14/pbt-podcast-talking-lakers-warriors-all-star-voting-and-a-chat-with-kenny-anderson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/14/pbt-podcast-talking-lakers-warriors-all-star-voting-and-a-chat-with-kenny-anderson/</link>
	<description>Basketball - NBC Sports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 10:39:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chawbacon14</title>
		<link>http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/14/pbt-podcast-talking-lakers-warriors-all-star-voting-and-a-chat-with-kenny-anderson/comment-page-1/#comment-148746</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chawbacon14]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 15:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=254658#comment-148746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is this podcast available on I-Tunes ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this podcast available on I-Tunes ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manchestermiracle</title>
		<link>http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/12/14/pbt-podcast-talking-lakers-warriors-all-star-voting-and-a-chat-with-kenny-anderson/comment-page-1/#comment-148677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[manchestermiracle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 03:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=254658#comment-148677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At what point are you clowns just beating a dead horse with the constant barrage about the Lakers? Yeah, they suck right now, they might suck the whole season. Yeah, all the Laker haters are blowing through their lotion and tissues having the time of their pathetic lives. Is PBT all about putting up everything they possibly can on a team with a losing record? When just about any other team wins we see one article about it here. When the Lakers lose there are three or four.

Is it not possible to focus on the positive things some teams are doing? Is this site really that dependent on page views generated by the folks desperate to see the Lakers fail? I look at posts about other teams and see anywhere from zero to maybe a dozen comments. PBT puts up a post about Kobe&#039;s choice of toe fungus cream and there&#039;s a hundred comments. A pretty sad business model, particularly since it reflects the schadenfreude (look it up, ya lazy bum) of the audience.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At what point are you clowns just beating a dead horse with the constant barrage about the Lakers? Yeah, they suck right now, they might suck the whole season. Yeah, all the Laker haters are blowing through their lotion and tissues having the time of their pathetic lives. Is PBT all about putting up everything they possibly can on a team with a losing record? When just about any other team wins we see one article about it here. When the Lakers lose there are three or four.</p>
<p>Is it not possible to focus on the positive things some teams are doing? Is this site really that dependent on page views generated by the folks desperate to see the Lakers fail? I look at posts about other teams and see anywhere from zero to maybe a dozen comments. PBT puts up a post about Kobe&#8217;s choice of toe fungus cream and there&#8217;s a hundred comments. A pretty sad business model, particularly since it reflects the schadenfreude (look it up, ya lazy bum) of the audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
