Skip to content

Lionel Hollins points to favorable schedule as the reason for the Grizzlies’ strong start

Dec 13, 2012, 11:46 AM EDT

Lionel Hollins, Jerryd Bayless, Mike Conley AP

PHOENIX — Reality has set in on the Memphis Grizzlies recently. But that doesn’t negate the team’s stronger-than-expected start.

After a loss in Phoenix on Wednesday to a Suns club that had dropped seven straight coming in, Memphis has now posted just two wins against three losses over its last five games. This may be closer to the true Grizzlies team that we will see over the course of the season, but they did open with a blistering record of 13-2, with quality wins over the Heat, Knicks, and Lakers during that stretch.

Before facing the Suns on Wednesday, I asked Hollins what he believed was the reason for his team’s early-season success. He clearly wasn’t overly excited about it, and was fairly logical in concluding that a favorable schedule was as much a reason for piling up those wins as was anything else.

“We won a few games against some really good teams that we didn’t do the year before,” he said. “I think our schedule was similar, except for the number of road games. In the past we’ve had 11 out of 14 on the road, and we played all of those teams on the road. This year we’ve had most of the good teams [at home] — except for the Clippers and Oklahoma City and San Antonio. We beat Miami at home, New York at home, the Lakers at home. It’s always nice to be at home.

“I think that we haven’t played a lot of back-to-backs; we’ve had a couple of back-to-backs, and we haven’t fared well in them so far. The schedule’s been very favorable.”

Memphis has only had three back-to-back sets thus far, and has won only once in that situation, on Nov. 17 at Charlotte.

Hollins is measured in his optimism because he’s well aware that early-season wins don’t translate to playoff success. Too many things can happen over the course of the year — including injuries, as Memphis was forced to deal with last season that affected its chance at a higher seed in the playoffs, and along with it, a lesser first round opponent.

The Grizzlies do have the league’s top-ranked defense right now in terms of points allowed per 100 possessions, and if that remains constant, good things will happen. But Hollins knows there’s plenty of room for improvement, and that there are simply too many factors at play for him to be idealistic about his team’s chances, especially with so much of the season’s games still remaining to be played.

“I don’t think we’ve played great every game by any stretch, but no team does,” he said. “What we want to do is continue to win, and get in a rhythm going toward the playoffs that lends itself to being successful. If we’re not playing well at the end of the year, we’re probably not going to be successful in the playoffs. But if we get to the point where we’re playing well, like we have in the past, things bode well.

“And then, you’ve got to have the right matchup.”

  1. jerdogthompson - Dec 13, 2012 at 12:15 PM

    Quality win over the Lakers?

    Just when I thought I’d seen the end of “dumb one liners”. C’mon Brett, you’re better/smarter than that aren’t you?

    • edweird0 - Dec 13, 2012 at 5:08 PM

      HAHAHAHA had the same reaction when I read that line.

    • Brett Pollakoff - Dec 13, 2012 at 6:41 PM

      Ha, a fine point. Hollins said it first though, I was simply playing along.

  2. rickcerv1286 - Dec 13, 2012 at 1:24 PM

    Im not a Grizzly fan nor a Laker fan but why is it that everytime i read a post about a team on here getting a quality win against good teams they add the lakers to that category.. the lakers are not a quality team. they are a disaster. that team needs help. To me they are not even consider a contender at all. So from now on they need to stop adding the lakers on the list of quality teams. Just Saying

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

Why can't Lakers have a player-coach?
Top 10 NBA Player Searches
  1. T. Warren (4454)
  2. L. James (4302)
  3. K. Love (4279)
  4. J. Nelson (3705)
  5. R. Allen (3507)
  1. C. Anthony (3022)
  2. K. Bryant (2792)
  3. D. Rose (2742)
  4. A. Wiggins (2625)
  5. C. Boozer (2139)