Skip to content

Biggest question left in training camp: James Harden’s extension

Oct 19, 2012, 5:24 PM EDT

James Harden AP

The question is not if James Harden wants to stay in Oklahoma City, he has said many times he wants to be part of this team as it tries to win a ring. The question is not if Oklahoma City wants him back, they know without him they may not be title contenders. The question isn’t if he loves the fans or the fans love him, just look at all the fake beards in the stands at a Thunder game.

No, the question as always is money.

By Oct. 31 the Thunder have to make a decision — offer Harden a max extension (four years, $58 million) and eat the tax that will come in a few years with that; or don’t offer an extension and let him become a restricted free agent next summer where another team (or teams) will make that same max offer to him. Then Thunder can match those offers, but the price is set.

Oklahoma City seems to hope Harden will give them a discount, he doesn’t seem inclined to do that. But the Thunder made their bed — they games Kevin Durant and Russell Westbrook max extensions in past years, then reached a four year, $50 million extension with Serge Ibaka this past summer. When they did that, they knew full well what the price — and tax — for Harden would be. Marc Stein at ESPN explains the Thunder’s financial decision this way:

Re-signing Harden to a max extension, then, would come at a debilitating cost. The team already has $70.8 million on the books for 2013-14. Add in a big Harden raise to, say, $13 million, then factor in the projected tax threshold of $70 million, and the league would ding the Thunder with penalties of $28 million during that season. Hmm. Harden salary: $13 million. Resulting tax: $28 million. It’d be like getting one Harden for the price of two.

Stein’s piece gives a false binary choice for Harden of being the next Joe Johnson — the star who demanded the max, left Phoenix for Atlanta and saw his reputation slip — or Manu Ginobili, who took less to win rings and stay in San Antonio. Those are certainly not the only two outcomes.

To me this comes back to the Thunder and their ownership — they chose to move out of Seattle to Oklahoma City, a smaller television market with less potential for local media revenue. They knew the finances of their move. They knew that Harden was a max player and that other teams would line up for him when OKC gave Westbrook and Ibaka their extensions. Thunder management and ownership knew the tax implications that would be coming their way.

The Thunder made their choices, they are not blameless in this. Harden has a right with his career to make his choices, to make as much as he can. The Thunder have their right to decide what they will and will not pay. But neither side gets to say the other side is fully at fault.

The Thunder owners have said they would pay the tax in the past. We’ll see if they really meant it. And while Harden is under no obligation to take less (the Thunder’s other stars didn’t) it also might be the wise move for his career.

By the Oct. 31 extension deadline we will have answers. And if the answer is no extension, there will be a lot more questions. Starting with: Should the Thunder trade Harden and get something for him while they can?

  1. 40thstreetblack - Oct 19, 2012 at 7:12 PM

    Harden is going to Chicago…book it.

  2. arliepro - Oct 19, 2012 at 8:12 PM

    Don’t be too sure of it. The Bulls’ FO doesn’t seem to be very eager to spend max $$$ these days.

  3. misterdreamer119 - Oct 19, 2012 at 8:32 PM

    They should sign him.

  4. herkulease - Oct 19, 2012 at 9:02 PM

    If we don’t see an extension, I suspect they will flip him for something. Some team will offer max or close to max with poison pill to screw with the Thunder if luxury tax is what is holding them back.

  5. savvybynature - Oct 19, 2012 at 9:32 PM

    First, the Thunder are still contenders without Harden. Durant and Westbrook are still getting better, as well as Ibaka.
    Second, Harden is not a max player imo. I don’t see him carrying a franchise to anything special, and I think it would be a mistake for any team to give him max money unless they simply don’t care about the luxury tax implications.
    Third, the Thunder ownership did NOT know what they were getting themselves into, as you say, because the new cap rules weren’t in place when they moved. Yes, they knew the media market was smaller, but they had no idea what the structure of the current CBA would look like.

  6. delusionalcardsfan - Oct 19, 2012 at 9:43 PM

    PHOENIX!!

  7. asublimeday - Oct 19, 2012 at 10:44 PM

    I’ve been saying Chicago for 3 months. Don’t steal…my thunder

  8. rj2323 - Oct 20, 2012 at 2:28 AM

    Pay the man. Without him I don’t think they could win a title but it looks to like he is going to be become a restricted free agent an I know Phoenix will make a huge push for him an I wouldn’t be surprised at all if he signed there he would be the number one option

  9. cambodianbreastmilk - Oct 20, 2012 at 6:19 AM

    Pay the guy. He’s gotta be worth a couple bucks just in marketing & advertising.

  10. rocirius - Oct 21, 2012 at 1:49 AM

    OKC should trade him to Dallas for OJ Mayo at the trade deadline.

  11. bballdad - Oct 21, 2012 at 6:44 AM

    Trade him for a point guard and move Brook to the 2 and HELLO!!!!

  12. rocirius - Oct 22, 2012 at 1:19 AM

    Harden for CP3!

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

What players stood out at World Cup?
Top 10 NBA Player Searches
  1. R. Rondo (2693)
  2. L. James (2645)
  3. E. Bledsoe (2563)
  4. K. Bryant (2460)
  5. D. Rose (2314)
  1. K. Irving (1971)
  2. R. Allen (1849)
  3. K. Durant (1658)
  4. N. Young (1627)
  5. G. Oden (1487)