<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Josh Smith says no more threes, call him “mid-range shawty”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/03/josh-smith-says-no-more-threes-call-him-mid-range-shawty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/03/josh-smith-says-no-more-threes-call-him-mid-range-shawty/</link>
	<description>Basketball - NBC Sports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 21:13:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nbascreed</title>
		<link>http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/03/josh-smith-says-no-more-threes-call-him-mid-range-shawty/comment-page-1/#comment-131029</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nbascreed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 11:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=186209#comment-131029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1.  First we need to define long two, mine is 18 inches inside the NBA and 12 for everything else.  I don&#039;t know what the advanced stats call it, but colloquial it is really a teaching term coaches use to help young shooters understand how to get a natural feel for where they are on the court and ensure that they aren&#039;t taking 3&#039;s with their feet on the line.  Like I said the advanced stats guys may have changed the definition to fit their analysis but a long two has always been on the line or right inside the line.  A pump fake and one strong dribble inside the line DO NOT constitute a long two, in my basketball playing opinion.  Not sure I&#039;ll ever let an advanced statistician talk me off that.

2.  &quot;The further you are from the basket the less likely you are to make a shot&quot;  I cede this point, but you CAN&#039;T use this to buttress your argument that the long two is the worse shot in basketball b/c the long two is closer than a 3 so using this logic alone the long two is a more &quot;makeable&quot; shot and thus a better shot than a 3.  

3.  In order to apply the difference in point argument that you employ you have to use real stats.  You say it&#039;s logic backed by simple stats but then use clearly made up numbers of 37% from long two and 34% from three.  This argument  makes a ton of sense IF your percentages are right but I don&#039;t think the spread b/t long two&#039;s and threes is that close.  I absolutely love spreadsheets and analysis so PLEASE point me in the direction of the data and I can run the numbers on this.  

4.  What about the fadeaway 15 footer that any credible wing has in their arsenal shot, that&#039;s got to be lower percentage than a straight up and down long two, no?  What about the &quot;deep three&quot; that both Carmelo and KD are well known for and even Kobe in his younger days.  Is that not a worse shot than a long two?  I think 30 of 30 coaches would say yes, regardless of who is stroking the pill.  Again, not sure how robust these advanced stats sites are, but I&#039;d love to have a look at the data.

In summary the term &quot;worst shot in basketball&quot; is colloquial and is used as a TEACHING mechanism for young shooters and wing players to help them understand court spacing and how to position themselves behind the line w/o having to constantly look down.  I really hate when I hear fans actually applying that as a technical term to the game, b/c it clearly is NOT true (at least until I analyze the data vis-a-vis point 2).

Again the only thing that makes your argument valid is actually running the numbers and finding they result in a spread that makes the 1 point difference in conversion worth taking a step back.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.  First we need to define long two, mine is 18 inches inside the NBA and 12 for everything else.  I don&#8217;t know what the advanced stats call it, but colloquial it is really a teaching term coaches use to help young shooters understand how to get a natural feel for where they are on the court and ensure that they aren&#8217;t taking 3&#8242;s with their feet on the line.  Like I said the advanced stats guys may have changed the definition to fit their analysis but a long two has always been on the line or right inside the line.  A pump fake and one strong dribble inside the line DO NOT constitute a long two, in my basketball playing opinion.  Not sure I&#8217;ll ever let an advanced statistician talk me off that.</p>
<p>2.  &#8220;The further you are from the basket the less likely you are to make a shot&#8221;  I cede this point, but you CAN&#8217;T use this to buttress your argument that the long two is the worse shot in basketball b/c the long two is closer than a 3 so using this logic alone the long two is a more &#8220;makeable&#8221; shot and thus a better shot than a 3.  </p>
<p>3.  In order to apply the difference in point argument that you employ you have to use real stats.  You say it&#8217;s logic backed by simple stats but then use clearly made up numbers of 37% from long two and 34% from three.  This argument  makes a ton of sense IF your percentages are right but I don&#8217;t think the spread b/t long two&#8217;s and threes is that close.  I absolutely love spreadsheets and analysis so PLEASE point me in the direction of the data and I can run the numbers on this.  </p>
<p>4.  What about the fadeaway 15 footer that any credible wing has in their arsenal shot, that&#8217;s got to be lower percentage than a straight up and down long two, no?  What about the &#8220;deep three&#8221; that both Carmelo and KD are well known for and even Kobe in his younger days.  Is that not a worse shot than a long two?  I think 30 of 30 coaches would say yes, regardless of who is stroking the pill.  Again, not sure how robust these advanced stats sites are, but I&#8217;d love to have a look at the data.</p>
<p>In summary the term &#8220;worst shot in basketball&#8221; is colloquial and is used as a TEACHING mechanism for young shooters and wing players to help them understand court spacing and how to position themselves behind the line w/o having to constantly look down.  I really hate when I hear fans actually applying that as a technical term to the game, b/c it clearly is NOT true (at least until I analyze the data vis-a-vis point 2).</p>
<p>Again the only thing that makes your argument valid is actually running the numbers and finding they result in a spread that makes the 1 point difference in conversion worth taking a step back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt Helin</title>
		<link>http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/03/josh-smith-says-no-more-threes-call-him-mid-range-shawty/comment-page-1/#comment-130921</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurt Helin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 20:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=186209#comment-130921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Simple logic backed by stats (and it is a thought growing in NBA circles as more advanced statistics come in): The farther you are away from the basket the less likely you are to make a shot, so you are less likely to make an 20 footer than an 8 footer. That is true for Carmelo, Smith and pretty much everyone. You want to take the shots you are more likely to make. Also, if you take a deep 2 and hit, say, 37 percent of them but can step back three feet and hit 34 percent of your threes, that is a better choice because you get rewarded with more points for that percentage of threes. 

There are only a couple guys in the league who hit long twos at a rate that makes it work, guys like Dirk Nowitzki. But they are the exception to the rule.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple logic backed by stats (and it is a thought growing in NBA circles as more advanced statistics come in): The farther you are away from the basket the less likely you are to make a shot, so you are less likely to make an 20 footer than an 8 footer. That is true for Carmelo, Smith and pretty much everyone. You want to take the shots you are more likely to make. Also, if you take a deep 2 and hit, say, 37 percent of them but can step back three feet and hit 34 percent of your threes, that is a better choice because you get rewarded with more points for that percentage of threes. </p>
<p>There are only a couple guys in the league who hit long twos at a rate that makes it work, guys like Dirk Nowitzki. But they are the exception to the rule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nbascreed</title>
		<link>http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/03/josh-smith-says-no-more-threes-call-him-mid-range-shawty/comment-page-1/#comment-130909</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nbascreed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 19:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=186209#comment-130909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kurt can you please tell me how the long two is the worst shot in basketball?  I&#039;d like to hear YOUR logic assuming you&#039;re not just repeating what you&#039;ve heard someone else say who also heard someone else say it who also heard someone else say it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kurt can you please tell me how the long two is the worst shot in basketball?  I&#8217;d like to hear YOUR logic assuming you&#8217;re not just repeating what you&#8217;ve heard someone else say who also heard someone else say it who also heard someone else say it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: superseahawk</title>
		<link>http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/03/josh-smith-says-no-more-threes-call-him-mid-range-shawty/comment-page-1/#comment-130840</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[superseahawk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 11:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=186209#comment-130840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s weird that he doesn&#039;t make those outside shots, he&#039;s got a beautiful looking jumper.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s weird that he doesn&#8217;t make those outside shots, he&#8217;s got a beautiful looking jumper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moseskkim</title>
		<link>http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/03/josh-smith-says-no-more-threes-call-him-mid-range-shawty/comment-page-1/#comment-130836</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[moseskkim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 08:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=186209#comment-130836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s tough for smoove if he catches it just inside the 3. Teams will dare him to shoot it right there and so the temptation will be there all season. You&#039;ll have to post him up a whole lot of u want to get his midrange shots down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s tough for smoove if he catches it just inside the 3. Teams will dare him to shoot it right there and so the temptation will be there all season. You&#8217;ll have to post him up a whole lot of u want to get his midrange shots down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
