Aug 31, 2012, 7:30 AM EDT
It’s a favorite little game of some to play — divide the wins by the payroll and see how much a team pays per win. It’s not always terribly reflective of reality, but it’s interesting. For example, do that for last season in the NBA and the Thunder look really good (their bills are just coming due).
Bloomberg’s businessweek.com decided to do that kind of study (for all four major sports) but tried to take a big picture view — they looked at the last five years and they gave bonuses for finishing over .500 and winning playoff games and championships.
So how did the NBA shake out? Here is their top 10:
Looks to me that by adding weight to playoff wins you basically made this a “win and you’re at the top” contest. The Lakers have been one of the biggest spenders (because they have the revenue to do it) but to be fair have been smart about it and won titles. Boston and Miami much the same, and Dallas has been the biggest spender of them all up until last season.
To me, it’s teams like the Spurs and Thunder that have been the smartest, getting wins while being fiscally responsible. But both of those teams were able to do that with a lucky draw in the lottery of an elite player who wanted to stay in a smaller market (Kevin Durant and Tim Duncan).
By the way, the bottom five are: