<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Inbounds: The Warriors become tank-proof</title>
	<atom:link href="http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/31/the-inbounds-the-warriors-become-tank-proof/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/31/the-inbounds-the-warriors-become-tank-proof/</link>
	<description>Basketball - NBC Sports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:42:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bougin89</title>
		<link>http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/31/the-inbounds-the-warriors-become-tank-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-119412</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bougin89]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 15:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=170548#comment-119412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;But in the end, they’re just a good team with no chance of being great and almost no chance of being terrible. The Warriors may not be as lovable next year, but they also in all likelihood won’t be losers. There’s something to be said for fielding a professional team, and not every team is in a “tank for No.1″ or “overspend to contend” mode.&quot;

Replace Warriors with Bucks and you have what i&#039;ve felt about the Bucks for many years. No chance of being great and almost no chance of being terrible. Good luck with Bogut though...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But in the end, they’re just a good team with no chance of being great and almost no chance of being terrible. The Warriors may not be as lovable next year, but they also in all likelihood won’t be losers. There’s something to be said for fielding a professional team, and not every team is in a “tank for No.1″ or “overspend to contend” mode.&#8221;</p>
<p>Replace Warriors with Bucks and you have what i&#8217;ve felt about the Bucks for many years. No chance of being great and almost no chance of being terrible. Good luck with Bogut though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khuxford</title>
		<link>http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/31/the-inbounds-the-warriors-become-tank-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-119373</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[khuxford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 10:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=170548#comment-119373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Curry and Bogut stay injured. Barnes is a rookie that had a good summer league, but folks felt was a reach where he was selected. Everyone else is a collection of parts that competing teams might like to help put them over the top, but don&#039;t combine to make it worth discussing as &quot;tank proof&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curry and Bogut stay injured. Barnes is a rookie that had a good summer league, but folks felt was a reach where he was selected. Everyone else is a collection of parts that competing teams might like to help put them over the top, but don&#8217;t combine to make it worth discussing as &#8220;tank proof&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itsonlyaspeedbump</title>
		<link>http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/31/the-inbounds-the-warriors-become-tank-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-119294</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[itsonlyaspeedbump]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 22:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=170548#comment-119294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liked the fact that Matt mentioned Warriors are in a big market. So much is made about the small-market teams not having a chance. Besides the fact that this simply isn&#039;t true (San Antonio anyone? OKC Thunder?), being in a large market does not guarantee success. Growing up in the Bay Area, I&#039;ve seen a lot of bad drafts and contracts from this franchise, and watched helplessly as they waste some of the decent talent they had.  Those have much to do with management, and little to do with market size.

What would the destinies of the Lakers and Charlotte Hornets have been if Charlotte had chosen to hang on to a gifted high schooler picked 13th overall in the &#039;96 NBA draft instead of trading him away? 

Chicago (3rd largest city in the US) was a mediocre to bad franchise post-Jordan era because free agents were not running to join the Bulls despite the market size. Fortunately for them, they drafted D.Rose.

NY, the largest market in the US and &#039;Mecca of basketball&#039; has only been a title contender a couple of times in the last 30 years.

The glamour franchises of the NBA (Lakers, Knicks, Celtics) will always be a draw, but that is due more to history and storytelling then to the so-called advantages of their market size.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liked the fact that Matt mentioned Warriors are in a big market. So much is made about the small-market teams not having a chance. Besides the fact that this simply isn&#8217;t true (San Antonio anyone? OKC Thunder?), being in a large market does not guarantee success. Growing up in the Bay Area, I&#8217;ve seen a lot of bad drafts and contracts from this franchise, and watched helplessly as they waste some of the decent talent they had.  Those have much to do with management, and little to do with market size.</p>
<p>What would the destinies of the Lakers and Charlotte Hornets have been if Charlotte had chosen to hang on to a gifted high schooler picked 13th overall in the &#8217;96 NBA draft instead of trading him away? </p>
<p>Chicago (3rd largest city in the US) was a mediocre to bad franchise post-Jordan era because free agents were not running to join the Bulls despite the market size. Fortunately for them, they drafted D.Rose.</p>
<p>NY, the largest market in the US and &#8216;Mecca of basketball&#8217; has only been a title contender a couple of times in the last 30 years.</p>
<p>The glamour franchises of the NBA (Lakers, Knicks, Celtics) will always be a draw, but that is due more to history and storytelling then to the so-called advantages of their market size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omniusprime</title>
		<link>http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/31/the-inbounds-the-warriors-become-tank-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-119271</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[omniusprime]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 20:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=170548#comment-119271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt Moore tanked this article for sure.  Matt are you trying to be the sports jester of the NBA?  Are you trying to get on the Comedy Channel?  With jokes like this you&#039;re well on your way.  We&#039;re talking the Warriors, one of the most worthless franchises in the NBA.  Of course they&#039;re going to tank, the idiotic upper mismanagement guarantees it.  Even with Jerry West&#039;s help this franchise is a perennial loser.  Sorry but the Warriors won&#039;t be upsetting the Lakers for the division title, nor give that other LA team a run for 2nd place.  Nope the only spot the Warriors are destined for is dead last.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt Moore tanked this article for sure.  Matt are you trying to be the sports jester of the NBA?  Are you trying to get on the Comedy Channel?  With jokes like this you&#8217;re well on your way.  We&#8217;re talking the Warriors, one of the most worthless franchises in the NBA.  Of course they&#8217;re going to tank, the idiotic upper mismanagement guarantees it.  Even with Jerry West&#8217;s help this franchise is a perennial loser.  Sorry but the Warriors won&#8217;t be upsetting the Lakers for the division title, nor give that other LA team a run for 2nd place.  Nope the only spot the Warriors are destined for is dead last.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nyyankeedave</title>
		<link>http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/31/the-inbounds-the-warriors-become-tank-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-119267</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nyyankeedave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 20:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=170548#comment-119267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They&#039;re doing more than my Knicks and that&#039;s a start.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re doing more than my Knicks and that&#8217;s a start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nyyankeedave</title>
		<link>http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/31/the-inbounds-the-warriors-become-tank-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-119266</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nyyankeedave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 20:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=170548#comment-119266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah...and your comment constitutes as &quot;downright stupid&quot; - grow up and learn yourself some NBA and then come back when you know what you&#039;re talking about. Until then, go back to watching ESPN&#039;s 24/7 &quot;Heat-Lakers-Knicks-Thunder-Celtics-Jeremy Lin-Tebow-Dwight Howard&quot; stuff.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah&#8230;and your comment constitutes as &#8220;downright stupid&#8221; &#8211; grow up and learn yourself some NBA and then come back when you know what you&#8217;re talking about. Until then, go back to watching ESPN&#8217;s 24/7 &#8220;Heat-Lakers-Knicks-Thunder-Celtics-Jeremy Lin-Tebow-Dwight Howard&#8221; stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 91devinhester23</title>
		<link>http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/31/the-inbounds-the-warriors-become-tank-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-119255</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[91devinhester23]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=170548#comment-119255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[really? I&#039;d say they&#039;re pretty liable to it if bogut and curry get injured (which is pretty likely)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really? I&#8217;d say they&#8217;re pretty liable to it if bogut and curry get injured (which is pretty likely)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arrowgargantuan</title>
		<link>http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/31/the-inbounds-the-warriors-become-tank-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-119253</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[arrowgargantuan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=170548#comment-119253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s also Utah&#039;s pick regardless, so tanking would be totallly pointless.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s also Utah&#8217;s pick regardless, so tanking would be totallly pointless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mannyfresh209</title>
		<link>http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/31/the-inbounds-the-warriors-become-tank-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-119239</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mannyfresh209]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 18:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=170548#comment-119239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bogut, Lee, Curry, Thompson, Barnes starting 5? Rush, Jefferson, Biedrins, Landry, Jack off the bench? That&#039;s nottt a bad squad right there, my good sir.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bogut, Lee, Curry, Thompson, Barnes starting 5? Rush, Jefferson, Biedrins, Landry, Jack off the bench? That&#8217;s nottt a bad squad right there, my good sir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khuxford</title>
		<link>http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/31/the-inbounds-the-warriors-become-tank-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-119230</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[khuxford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 17:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=170548#comment-119230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow...THAT is what constitutes a &quot;downright pretty good&quot; roster these days?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;THAT is what constitutes a &#8220;downright pretty good&#8221; roster these days?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
