May 3, 2012, 4:20 PM EDT
Jason Kidd will be a 39-year-old free agent this summer, which is usually when a veteran takes a small paycheck (by NBA standards, anyway) to win a ring and just stay in the game.
Hearing Jason Kidd isn’t interested in playing for a vets minimum or small exception. If he doesn’t get a mid-level type offer, he’ll quit.
That means about $5 million a year. Which will be too rich for Dallas’ blood (although they have their attention focused on Deron Williams anyway). Now, if I were trying to get as much money as I can out of a last contract, I’d say exactly what Kidd said in this situation. Even if I didn’t mean it.
Kidd had arguably the worst year of his career last year, with 6.2 points and 5.5 assists per game in just under 29 minutes a game. He had a PER of 13.1 — below the league average but not really out of line with a lot of backup point guards in the league. He has struggled shooting in the playoffs, going 4-18. But he is still a cagey guy with the ball in his hands, one who tests and probes defenses in a clever way, something that has a lot of value.
For teams, are you willing to spend $5 million on a veteran but slowed Kidd, or would you rather give those minutes to a young player you are trying to develop? Likely with a much cheaper contract.
- PBT Extra: Spurs lead Texas winners in NBA Free Agency 0
- J.J. Redick: Clippers deserve “F” for free agency after losing DeAndre Jordan 19
- PBT Podcast: Free agency’s winners and losers 0
- Report: Boston Celtics agree to trade for David Lee for Gerald Wallace 17
- Report: Kevin Garnett to re-sign with Timberwolves 17
- Report: Mo Williams signing with Cavaliers for most of their MLE 24
- Report: Cavaliers, Clippers discussing Jamal Crawford for Brendan Haywood trade 26
- Reports: David West agrees to veteran minimum deal to play for Spurs 80