Comments on: Lakers send Devin Ebanks down to D-League

By: Kurt Helin

Kurt Helin — Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:55:56 +0000

Can’t anyway. Only players in their first two years or on injury rehab (with the player’s consent).

By: max20characters

max20characters — Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:07:01 +0000

Guess he isnt Trevor Ariza after all.

By: 00maltliquor

00maltliquor — Thu, 16 Feb 2012 06:13:58 +0000

I wish! You can only send players down to the D-league who are in their 1st and 2nd years. I’m not sure but I think maybe even their 3rd year but definatly the 1st two years. And if there was such thing as an F-league they need to send Steve Flake down there too!

By: lakerdownunder

lakerdownunder — Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:18:46 +0000

??? What would be the value in sending Luke?

By: lakerdownunder

lakerdownunder — Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:17:50 +0000

sending someone to the D-League does not open a roster spot. He is being sent purely to gain playing time

By: velascochad

velascochad — Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:18:51 +0000

wait,, why not send luke walton instead of him? i just don’t get it.

By: velascochad

velascochad — Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:17:32 +0000

so bruno mars will play in the D-league for now. i hope LA will get a facilitator type of PG.

By: mlblogsbig3bosox

mlblogsbig3bosox — Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:47:11 +0000

I agree with you in the minutes part but sending a player to the D-League does open a roster spot. I don’t know maybe this means J.R. Smith or maybe it’s all speculation.

By: adeedothatswho

adeedothatswho — Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:35:00 +0000

I think it’s to get him more playing time. He hasn’t played in the last seven games, and the move doesn’t open a roster spot. He just isn’t getting used with a healthy Barnes and MWP.