Skip to content

Portland’s bandwagon getting full as Lakers come to town

Jan 5, 2012, 2:24 PM EDT

portland-trail-blazers Gerald Wallace AP

As you read this, the Portland Trail Blazers are the top seed in the Western Conference. Which after five whole games has all the meaning of a politician’s campaign promise, even in a 66 game season. Few people mention them as title contenders.

But if you were watching the other day they beat Oklahoma City comfortably. A few people took notice. Thursday night they get the Los Angeles Lakers, win that (and the Lakers always struggle in Portland) and that Trail Blazers bandwagon is going to start to fill up.

How did this happen? Portland was a team built for Brandon Roy and Greg Oden to be the stars, but their bodies betrayed them and the Blazers had to go another direction.

They went that direction fast — every season since ’05-06 the Trail Blazers have been one of the three slowest-playing teams in the league. This season they are the fourth fastest (97.4 possessions per game, stats via Hoopdata). With that they have maintained their offensive efficiency, which at 104.7 points per 100 possessions is fifth best in the NBA.

Part of the reason for that success is they are not settling for jumpers any more, as Zach Lowe broke down at Sports Illustrated’s Point Forward.

The Blazers took a lot of shots (26) at the rim (against the Thunder), something they have done much more of this season. About28 of Portland’s 83 shots per game – 33.7 percent — have come at the rim; such close shots accounted for just 30.5 percent of its overall attempts last season, and considering how often this team is getting to the line now, those stats undersell the degree to which it is going to the basket. LaMarcus Aldridge is shooting more jumpers, but he hasn’t reduced his close shots or free throws in the process. Gerald Wallace is barely shooting long two-pointers at all so far, preferring to either fly to the rim or shoot threes.

They also have the fifth best defense in the league, 94.7 points allowed per 100 possessions.

That’s’ a 10 point per 100 possessions differential. The only teams with better ones are the Heat, Bulls and Nuggets. (You expect the Heat and Bulls, the Nuggets are another team surprising us early.)

Can they keep it up? That is the big question. Can they continue to defend at this level — they were an average defensive team the last few years, are they just playing well in a hot streak to start the season or are they this good? Will other teams’ threes start to fall? Portland has six players averaging double-digits in scoring per game, can they maintain that kind of balance? Can Aldridge be the go-to guy in the clutch? Jamal Crawford can keep up this pace, but can Marcus Camby and Kurt Thomas? Portland has been a great rebounding team this season after being weak at it in years past, will they revert?

I’m not convinced they are contenders, not yet. But I also don’t think all the numbers are flukes. In a Western Conference in transition Portland is going to be a top-four seed in West and come the playoffs they will be a handful for any of the preseason contender

  1. shaner329 - Jan 5, 2012 at 2:47 PM

    Their success makes you wonder how great this team could be if Greg Oden and Brandon Roy were healthy enough to play.

    • Kurt Helin - Jan 5, 2012 at 6:10 PM

      Healthy? They are top tier contenders.

  2. slopmcflop - Jan 5, 2012 at 3:11 PM

    Nate McMillan really deserves more credit for coaching this team up. Gone are the JailBlazers, and in are a bunch of no nonsense high IQ basketball guys. Every year they seem to face a rash of injuries, but he keeps them in contention. Showing a willingness to change up the tempo for the team is another sign of a quality coach. Let’s see if they can keep this torrid pace up.

    • qdog112 - Jan 5, 2012 at 3:51 PM

      I absolutely agree with you. Nate has been a great coach from day one. He worked similar magic in Seattle. He coaches just like he played, low key, steady, intelligently, with a defensive-minded slant. He’s not a glory seeker and seems always in full control of his team and temperament. Nate is a low maintenance, high output guy who I have followed and admired since his days at NC State.

  3. goforthanddie - Jan 5, 2012 at 3:54 PM

    They’re a really good team, but they’re going to wear down. Nate likes to wear people down, play a short bench, and this is the wrong year for that.

  4. 00maltliquor - Jan 5, 2012 at 4:43 PM

    They are title contenders. I can’t remember if I’ve said that here or to my friends, but they have a legit shot to upset anyone. Will they win it all? Most likely not, my money’s not on it, but I wouldn’t be terribly surprised.

  5. letsgosharks - Jan 5, 2012 at 5:12 PM

    Good to see the Blazers doing so well.they have a great fan base and Nate McMillen is a by underrated coach.

  6. jimothyvonstojavic - Jan 6, 2012 at 2:27 AM

    Finally we get some recognition. People who say we have great fans are right. No self praise intended. I’ve been to games where we’re down 15 but people keep chanting defense and stuff. It’s a great atmosphere.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Top 10 NBA Player Searches
  1. D. Rose (2161)
  2. L. James (1899)
  3. K. Irving (1726)
  4. K. Bryant (1697)
  5. A. Davis (1461)