Skip to content

Cavaliers use amnesty clause on Baron Davis

Dec 14, 2011, 8:36 PM EDT

Miami Heat v Cleveland Cavaliers Getty Images

The Cleveland Cavaliers have officially announced that they have used their team’s “amnesty clause” on Baron Davis, and waived the 32-year old guard from their roster. Davis’ current contract will pay him 13.95 million dollars this season, and Davis has a player option for 14.85 million next season. Davis will still make that money, but his contract will no longer count against Cleveland’s salary cap figures.

Davis, along with what turned out to be the #1 overall pick in the 2011 draft, was traded to the Cavaliers for Mo Williams last season, and the Cavaliers did play significantly better after acquiring Davis. Davis’ three-point shooting was abnormally good in Cleveland — a career 32% three-point shooter, Davis shot 41.4% from deep in his 15 games with the Cavaliers.

That late-season shooting surge will make Davis enticing to a number of top teams who are currently without a great option at point guard, namely the Lakers, Heat, and Knicks. Size, passing ability, and outside shooting ability are what allows guards to play well once they get on the wrong side of 30 — Davis has always been a big guard (and has often shown up to training camps a bit too big), and has always passed well, but he has traditionally made his teams suffer by settling for a lot of outside shots and making very few of them.

If Davis’ 3-point shooting in Cleveland comes with him to his next team, he will help them — if it doesn’t, he could end up throwing away possessions for teams that have some great scorers on their rosters. (If you don’t believe NBA GMs are capable of having short memories when it comes to a player’s ability to shoot the 3, remember how much money Trevor Ariza made after he got hot from deep in the 2009 playoffs.)

Davis would have helped take some pressure off of #1 pick Kyrie Irving if he’d stayed in Cleveland, and Cavaliers owner Dan Gilbert has been a very vocal opponent of letting the NBA’s best teams get better at the expense of small-market teams, so I’m inclined to believe that Davis either asked the Cavaliers to let him go or showed up to camp in such iffy shape that the Cavaliers don’t believe he’ll provide much help to whatever contender ultimately signs him. Of course, Davis was making a lot of money and providing relatively little production, so it’s possible that Dan Gilbert and Chris Grant might simply have plans for how to improve the team now that Davis’ contract no longer counts against their salary cap.

  1. cantonbound13 - Dec 14, 2011 at 8:55 PM

    He’d do great in D’Antoni system.

  2. zacmonte - Dec 14, 2011 at 9:03 PM

    I don’t know if he will make it to them, but Baron becoming a Knick would be awesome

  3. bigslick2727 - Dec 14, 2011 at 9:06 PM

    Easy decision if you are Cavs management.

  4. 1972wasalongtimeago - Dec 14, 2011 at 10:36 PM

    Gilbert’s paying this guy $29 million over the next two years to not play for him. How many times does he have to re-prove his ineptitude as an owner? Gilbert is a joke, and as a result, so is his franchise. Thats why Lebron left. All you idiots in Cleveland burning Lebron jerseys should point your anger and frustration where it belongs. At Dan Gilbert.

    • 00maltliquor - Dec 14, 2011 at 10:44 PM

      I feel you man on all things Dan Gilbert related but one thing. The Cavs pretty much robbed the Clippers w/o the ski mask getting the number 1 pick for essentially nothing but a dump off of Mo Williams. B.Diddy’s contract is not gonna count against the Cavs books and they’ll pay it throug the course of 5 years in small increments. Chump change for that whimpering, sniveling little prick.

      • therealhtj - Dec 15, 2011 at 1:05 PM

        He’s off the books, but the Cavs pay it out in two years minus whatever any team that picks him up pays which’ll be league minimum at best.

        I think you’re confusing amnesty with the stretch provision. As for the Clips getting robbed, I’d say hardly. They’re a playoff team now at a minimum. Good luck saying the same thing about the Cavs anytime soon.

    • hbdbrowns33 - Dec 14, 2011 at 11:03 PM

      its a player option the cavs wouldn’t pay it the new team would. The cavs are only on the hook for his salary this year.

      • 00maltliquor - Dec 14, 2011 at 11:40 PM

        Well then if that’s the case then that just further solidifies my previous statement. The Cavs won big time.
        However, I think that the team that picks him up only pays what they put on the table to scoop him up. The former team still has to pick up the rest of the tab and spread it out twice the length of the contract plus one year. Hence the 5 years.

  5. mondzy805 - Dec 14, 2011 at 11:32 PM

    Can you say, hello Lakers.

    • bozosforall - Dec 15, 2011 at 9:01 AM

      Hello Lakers

  6. ljl2 - Dec 14, 2011 at 11:34 PM

    Just an FYI, Baron expires this year, not next. Also, he is looking at possibly 3 months of being out with a bulging disc. So please, keep bashing the Cavs instead of bein logical.

  7. djanarchy757 - Dec 15, 2011 at 11:05 AM

    not the loyal Cavs…say it aint so

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Top 10 NBA Player Searches
  1. D. Rose (2813)
  2. K. Irving (2279)
  3. A. Davis (1932)
  4. K. Bryant (1577)
  5. L. James (1483)
  1. K. Durant (1344)
  2. T. Thompson (1304)
  3. B. Jennings (1279)
  4. M. Leonard (1191)
  5. A. Aminu (1167)