Skip to content

Report: Good news, the league and players agree on some things! Only, like, three, but still!

Oct 22, 2011, 2:00 PM EDT

billy-hunter-david-stern Getty Images

One of the things that Adam Silver and Peter Holt said at their press conference Thursday, in-between explaining their completely ridiculous obstinacy regarding the 50/50 split and looking like someone stole their 1992 Alonzo Mourning rookie card (I will never forgive that kid), is that federal mediator George Cohen starts his sessions by getting both sides to state the little things they agree on. It’s a baby-step kind of process. It shows you’re not completely and totally diametrically opposed at this point in the negotiation.

From the New York Times, we’ve learned a little bit about what it is that they’ve agreed upon. They’re things which will have a huge impact on how the league is run, even if both sides consider them microscopic compared to the big issues that lie ahead.

¶ There will be a one-time “amnesty” provision that will allow each team to waive a player (with pay) without his salary counting against the salary cap.

¶ There will be a “stretch” exception, available every year, allowing teams to waive players and stretch out their remaining salary over a number of seasons, thus reducing the annual salary-cap hit.

¶ The midlevel exception will be set around $5 million, a decrease of $800,000, but more than double what the owners were seeking.

via With N.B.A. Talks Halted, Sides Predict a Meeting Next Week – NYTimes.com.

The stretch exception is the biggest piece out of that. It means that owners will be able to get out of those terrible contracts that they give out. It also means that you’re going to see players making money from several teams in a season. That happens now, but it will increase. This could really help teams in the rebuilding process. If you’re laden with a huge contract you whiffed on, say… whatever the Blazers do next. The Blazers could then dump the player and stretch out the salary over a longer period of time, freeing them to overpay for someone else in the next free agency. Think of all the players the Blazers can overpay for!

In all seriousness, these measures provide a backbone for what the new league is going to look like. You know, eventually. When we have a season. If ever.

I’m going to go back to crying in this bottle now.

  1. danielcp0303 - Oct 22, 2011 at 2:36 PM

    All seem like good ideas to me. Bad contracts are actually needed in order to make trades work, which is a really exciting part of the nba season. Although maybe you could do something with the contracts for trades, maybe “stretch” the cap hit so that the money matches up easier…then you wouldn’t need bad contracts.

  2. goforthanddie - Oct 22, 2011 at 9:27 PM

    Funny how Portland keeps selling out and posting winning seasons/playoff appearances, even with all those bad contracts you speak of (which number 1).
    Way to not support your own point. Stick with your bottle.

  3. hardjudge - Oct 23, 2011 at 2:20 AM

    Sounds like the players should start their own league and let the owners play basketball for themselves. MJ is a little old, but he would be the best player int he owners league.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

Will LeBron get booed Christmas Day in Miami?
Top 10 NBA Player Searches
  1. K. Love (3782)
  2. D. Rose (3191)
  3. K. Bryant (2698)
  4. L. James (2628)
  5. K. Irving (2300)
  1. A. Davis (2144)
  2. T. Young (2093)
  3. R. Allen (1993)
  4. S. Marion (1848)
  5. E. Okafor (1746)