<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mychal Thompson says the players need to take 50/50 deal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/20/mychal-thompson-says-the-players-need-to-take-5050-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/20/mychal-thompson-says-the-players-need-to-take-5050-deal/</link>
	<description>Basketball - NBC Sports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:04:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: therealhtj</title>
		<link>http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/20/mychal-thompson-says-the-players-need-to-take-5050-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-54955</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[therealhtj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=33232#comment-54955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kurt, I know you&#039;ve taken your position and can&#039;t reverse it now, but your arguments simply don&#039;t hold water.  There is no CBA as of today.  Nothing.  Nada.  &quot;Giving back&quot; a couple of percentage points you don&#039;t actually have isn&#039;t exactly a giveback, now is it?  The players may want to use the last, lopsided deal as a precedent, but that does not exist.  Giving back a few percentage points will probably only effect less than 10% of the 450 players the NBPA supposedly represents.  Superstars will still get superstar pay and rookies and scrubs will get rookie and scrub pay.  All the middle earners will get a bit squeezed, but let&#039;s face it, no one&#039;s ever paid a dime to see them play.  I&#039;d rather see younger, hungrier players in those roster spots, and I&#039;m certain I&#039;m not alone.

No one is asking for contract rollbacks at this point.  The players will be guaranteed a percentage of the revenues without risk.  Whether that percentage is 53, 52, 51, or 50 percent is really all that&#039;s left to be decided.  The hard cap is off the table, so all that&#039;s left is to be decided is how restrictive the luxury taxes will be and what&#039;ll remain of the exemptions.

So far the entire negotiation only feels like a boon to the non-competitive, small market teams.  Large markets and a couple of the smaller markets with soon to be growing payrolls (OKC and Memphis), are going to feel the pinch almost immediately.  Subsequent Eddy Curry-ish contracts will still happen much to the delight of the NBPA.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kurt, I know you&#8217;ve taken your position and can&#8217;t reverse it now, but your arguments simply don&#8217;t hold water.  There is no CBA as of today.  Nothing.  Nada.  &#8220;Giving back&#8221; a couple of percentage points you don&#8217;t actually have isn&#8217;t exactly a giveback, now is it?  The players may want to use the last, lopsided deal as a precedent, but that does not exist.  Giving back a few percentage points will probably only effect less than 10% of the 450 players the NBPA supposedly represents.  Superstars will still get superstar pay and rookies and scrubs will get rookie and scrub pay.  All the middle earners will get a bit squeezed, but let&#8217;s face it, no one&#8217;s ever paid a dime to see them play.  I&#8217;d rather see younger, hungrier players in those roster spots, and I&#8217;m certain I&#8217;m not alone.</p>
<p>No one is asking for contract rollbacks at this point.  The players will be guaranteed a percentage of the revenues without risk.  Whether that percentage is 53, 52, 51, or 50 percent is really all that&#8217;s left to be decided.  The hard cap is off the table, so all that&#8217;s left is to be decided is how restrictive the luxury taxes will be and what&#8217;ll remain of the exemptions.</p>
<p>So far the entire negotiation only feels like a boon to the non-competitive, small market teams.  Large markets and a couple of the smaller markets with soon to be growing payrolls (OKC and Memphis), are going to feel the pinch almost immediately.  Subsequent Eddy Curry-ish contracts will still happen much to the delight of the NBPA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bravin4evr</title>
		<link>http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/20/mychal-thompson-says-the-players-need-to-take-5050-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-54953</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bravin4evr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=33232#comment-54953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mychal Thompson needs to shut his damn mouth....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mychal Thompson needs to shut his damn mouth&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
