Skip to content

Stern says owners unified, “vast majority” favor hard cap

Sep 15, 2011, 10:14 PM EDT

David Stern AP

A few hours after the players told a tale unity it was the owners turn. At least we didn’t have to see a bunch of them in “stand” T-shirts.

David Stern emerged from more than four hours of meetings with the NBA owners Thursday and said that despite reports to the contrary the owners are unified. Which is exactly what the players said after their meeting. Which is exactly what you expect both sides to say.

Deputy Commissioner Adam Silver said it clearly: “There is absolute agreement, and it’s a complete fiction coming from somewhere that there isn’t.”

What Stern said that was interesting was that a “vast majority” of owners favor a hard salary cap. He shot down reports that the owners disagree on this issue.

“Some people might say they want a hard cap with this wrinkle and someone says I want a hard cap with that wrinkle,” Stern said. “But I would say there is unanimity in favoring a hard cap — period.”

The hard salary cap has been the sticking point of these negotiations, that and keeping the cap tied to a percentage of the league’s revenue (basketball related income, or BRI). The players have offered to give up four or five percentage points off their 57 percent share of BRI, but they don’t want a hard salary cap and they want what cap there is to be tied to BRI.

If the owners truly are committed to a hard cap, this is going to be long and ugly. But if the players get down to 50 or 51 percent of the BRI, would a majority of owners be willing to get away from a hard cap?

Stern and Silver made it sound like no, but that’s what the future weeks of negotiation are about.

  1. florida727 - Sep 16, 2011 at 10:10 AM

    Unfortunately for the players, they need to realize they are nothing more than “employees” of the owners. All the risk is being taken on by the owners, none by the players. Therefore, the owners SHOULD make the lion’s share of the money. A hard cap allows the owners to better project expenses, thereby better being able to determine their financial needs. They can better determine ticket prices, TV rights deals, concessions, parking, etc., in an effort to achieve their financial objectives as owners. The hard cap also helps foster an environment of the proverbial level-playing-field. The problem with the percentage arrangement is that the big market teams, absent equal revenue sharing, will always have an advantage over the smaller market teams, and you’ll always have a competitive imbalance.

    Sorry, players, but you’re on the wrong end of this deal. Go a few years without a paycheck and let me now how your ‘solidarity’ is working out. Kobe, LeBron, Wade, etc., will all be just fine. They already have enough to live on comfortably. What about the guy sitting near the end of the bench? He’s the guy that can NOT afford to have this thing drag out. And that’s where the players as a whole lose their leverage.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

Why can't Lakers have a player-coach?
Top 10 NBA Player Searches
  1. T. Warren (5037)
  2. L. James (4364)
  3. K. Love (3812)
  4. D. Rose (3536)
  5. C. Anthony (2769)
  1. K. Bryant (2659)
  2. R. Allen (2562)
  3. J. Nelson (2421)
  4. B. Griffin (2127)
  5. C. Boozer (1975)