Skip to content

If NBA players decertify the union, might owners void all deals?

Jul 25, 2011, 1:52 PM EDT

NBA & NBA Players Association Announce New CBA Getty Images

Why would a group of agents be pushing for the NBA players to decertify the union and sue the league on anti-trust grounds?

Because it’s seen as leverage — that anti-trust suit comes with triple damages, win big money and it becomes gigantic money. That threat, in theory, would push the owners to negotiate and give the union leverage.

But that move would come with risks — including the league wiping out every existing contract if the union decertifies. David Aldridge over at NBA.com has an interesting discussion of the decertification possibilities in a column Monday.

Keep one number in mind as powerful agents beat their chests about decertification: $4 billion. That’s the total amount of guaranteed contract money in the system that the NBA and its owners insist will go poof if the players decide to dissolve the National Basketball Players Association….

As far as the $4 billion goes, the league’s contention that the contracts would disappear is true only to a point. At some point, the league will reach a deal with the union, and would almost certainly have to reinstate the players’ contracts once the union recertified. The alternative would be either implementing work rules on the players without a deal, which would leave the league vulnerable to a potential players’ strike, or additional antitrust penalties if players sought redress while they continued to play under the imposed rules.

At any rate, the agents do not believe that the league would actually go ahead and void all of those contracts. Such a move could, at least theoretically, make every player in the league a free agent, able to go wherever they wanted. And owners like, say, Miami’s Micky Arison, might have a problem with that.

David Stern has called decertification “the nuclear option” and right now union executive director Billy Hunter is treating it that way. Federal courts are still slow and whether it’s just for leverage or not decertifying the union would reset the talks in a way. Games would be missed for sure.

Aldridge puts it well — right now the hawks among the owners that want major changes to the financial system are driving the bus on that side. But the players have hawks, too — agents and players willing to go to court. And nobody could feel confident of getting a win in the courts, that would be a drawn out and risky play for both sides.

Let us hope it doesn’t come to this. But the players are keeping union decertification on the table, and if they play that card it is going to get ugly. Or maybe we should say much uglier.

  1. yikes123 - Jul 26, 2011 at 4:32 PM

    There is something very wrong here. This is supposed to be a discussion of terms between 425 NBA players and the 30 NBA owners, who underwrite the League costs.

    But now we are given to understand the shots are being called by sports agents?

    If you go to hype hoops there is a roster of sports agents, players they rep and the contracts with values.

    It turns out TEN sports agencies represent 69% of the NBA players. And fewer than five of these agencies (if they are leading their players around by the nose) could get the 130 votes to decertify.

    Throw the agents out of the room and back into their 90291 pools. This is about the sport, the future of the sport, the players, their long term income (via union benefits). This is not about the Here and Now of ten “The Color of Money” sports agents.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

Will LeBron get booed Christmas Day in Miami?
Top 10 NBA Player Searches
  1. K. Love (4030)
  2. D. Rose (3415)
  3. K. Bryant (2740)
  4. L. James (2689)
  5. T. Young (2621)
  1. K. Irving (2535)
  2. A. Davis (2063)
  3. R. Allen (1982)
  4. G. Hayward (1900)
  5. E. Bledsoe (1839)