Jun 26, 2011, 1:00 PM EST
At new head coach Mark Jackson’s introductory press conference at the NBA Finals, a reporter asked if the Warriors would try and get bigger. Instead of citing Andris Biedrins, David Lee, and Ekpe Udoh, Jackson instead made a bizarre comment about how you can look at the Mavericks and see you don’t see size, referencing Tyson Chandler and Shawn Marion. Getting past the fact that Tyson Chandler is as long as the day is, the approach was interesting and lead you to believe that the Warriors knew they needed to go in another direction down low, if only to pair a true center with Lee. With the amount of money Biedrins makes (he’s owed another $27 million over three years), it’s natural that the Latvian who has slid backwards with bigger responsibilities since showing promise with the “We Believe” team of the late 2000’s would be the one to go.
From the Contra-Costa Times:
I’ve been told the Rockets have offered Hasheem Thabeet and Jordan Hill. Haven’t confirmed if they were offered as a package, but the figures add up. Thabeet, a former No. 2 overall pick, is widely regarded as someone who simply not good enough to play in the NBA and probably won’t be. There is still some hope for Jordan Hill, but he’s got a Post-It note on his back that says “stiff.”
Bottom line for the Warriors: that’s not enough.
Makes sense, except for the fact those players come off the books sooner and are cheaper and easily moved in other trades. But maybe more concerning than that (because that is a pretty terrible package for anyone) is this quote from Warriors president of Basketball Operations Kirk Lacob (son of owner Joe Lacob) from BasketUSA via Hoopshype:
Houston has offered more packages for Biedrins but we were not interested. We would not let this guy go. He is only 25 years old and is one of the most agile 7-footers in the world. He averaged a double double average number of years ago and it will take a large package to let him go.
Be aware that’s a translation from French, so that always comes with pitfalls. But the point shines through. The problem is that the Warriors don’t need agile bigs. They need big bigs. And they might be able to get a better package down the line, but they don’t need to be going into talks thinking they have some sort of incredible player. His stock is low. You can work to get it higher, but at some point you need to pull the trigger and move on. While Biedrins’ future in Golden State is far from certain, it does look like he won’t be going to the first team to offer an even decent package to the Warriors, and certainly not to the platter of nothingness Houston’s offered so far.
(Side note: You know why you don’t hire your 22-year-old son as President of Basketball Operations? Because of things like “He’ll openly tell a French website that another team has made an offer.” That’s a good start.)
- Derek Fisher questions ‘character and integrity’ of players after Knicks lose to Kings by 38 points 3
- Five Things We Learned in NBA Tuesday: The Hawks clinched playoff spot in front of Josh Smith 2
- Nuggets need to decide direction, then hire coach 18
- Report: Russell Westbrook ‘likely’ to return to Thunder lineup Wednesday, will wear protective mask 13
- Nuggets have fired head coach Brian Shaw 29
- Five Things We Learned in NBA Monday: Goran Dragic got his revenge in concentrated form 5
- League suspends James Harden one game for kick to LeBron James’ groin 23
- PBT’s weekly NBA Power Rankings: Hawks seem to be out of malaise. Maybe. 11