Comments on: Bulls’ Rose wearing “precautionary” walking boot for ankle; MRI negative

By: gilgameth

gilgameth — Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:50:43 +0000

Hilarious! Yeah, twenty five years, that’s impressive! You won’t even be able to say that next year, and again, who cares about hockey? Okay fine, the Bulls are paper tigers that are soft as a sneaker full of steaming sh*t, and so were the last two Bears teams that made the playoffs. I am not even going to mention the Cubs’ love affair with futility, but Ozzie Guillen is gem, so maybe I’ll give the southsiders a pass. If a Chicago team hangs a banner in the NEXT 25 years, I will bet that it will be the mighty Sky club who are at least as tough as they look.

By: philtration

philtration — Tue, 26 Apr 2011 02:26:12 +0000

Yeah… mediocre teams here in Chicago.
Only city in the country to have won championships in the NFL, NBA, NHL and MLB in the last 25 years.

What kind of guy says something like “flim-flam bunch of phoney baloneys”?
Go back to your stupid video games Ned Flanders.

By: gilgameth

gilgameth — Tue, 26 Apr 2011 01:37:50 +0000

You’re right, I’m stalking you, and it is weird. And boring! All I am trying to say is that da Bulls are a flim-flam bunch of phoney baloneys. You Chicago fans get all geeked about your mediocre teams that for some reason do really well in the regular season but in the post season they flame, except maybe for the ‘Hawks but no on cares about hockey. I’m hatin’ because it is so damn easy, and listening to Chicago fans talk about their teams is like listening to someone chew with their mouth open…equally disgusting and annoying.

By: philtration

philtration — Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:46:31 +0000

Are you stalking my comments now?
Weird at best.

I like how when the Bulls win it is a Pacer meltdown yet when the Pacers finally win a game it is because they are a good team.
I never said that the Bulls are not playing poorly in this series.
They are.
I also never said that the Pacers are not playing over their heads.
They are.

You are reading too much into the Bulls not sweeping the series and you are acting like these two teams are evenly matched.
The Bulls are a much better team than the Pacers and if you can’t see that then you really don’t know much about the game.

By: gilgameth

gilgameth — Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:21:53 +0000

See? From your other posts, you sound like there is no reason to worry, so even you know the Bulls are underachieving. Maybe they are not underachieving, though. Maybe they just aren’t near as good as there record indicated, otherwise I would be baffled how the Pacers could keep these games so close. They have not lead by more than 7 points at any time in any game, and barring huge Pacer meltdowns inside the last three minutes of games one and four, the blue team would be up 3-1. How about doubling Granger or taking care of the ball or getting ANY bench play other than Korver…sounds like they’ll need a few more players other than Boozer to step it up. Rose is going to have to get someone to take his SATs for him in round 2 unless he gets some consistent O out of Deng and Bogans…

By: philtration

philtration — Mon, 25 Apr 2011 01:12:25 +0000

It is Boozer that needs to step it up.
Soft defense and way too many missed shots right next to the rim is not what they are paying him for.