Skip to content

Winderman: NBA should have replay official for playoffs

Apr 20, 2011, 7:00 PM EDT

NBA Finals Game 3: Los Angeles Lakers v Boston Celtics Getty Images

Before each playoff game, four referees enter their locker room. Only three emerge.

The fourth is in attendance in case of injury, a smart move by the league with so much at stake.

The greater issue, especially in light of some egregious officiating errors this postseason, is why not utilize that fourth pair of eyes?

No, not on the court. There’s already enough clutter there. But why not in the TV truck, where numerous angles are available both in real time and on replay. With almost every postseason game on network TV, the camerawork also is at playoff level.

We’re not talking about reviewing every call or even many of them.

But it would allow any replay situations to be handled faster and with a greater assortment of angles, and without coaches preening over shoulders or fans mucking up the process at the scorers’ table.

Beyond that, if there is an egregious error late in a game, and a coach is willing to burn a timeout (such would be the cost, similar to the NFL), then an instant second look in the TV truck would be possible, those same after-the-fact replays that offer such a striking indictment after the score is final.

Yes, it would only be for the postseason, because it is the only time four officials are present, by rule, in the building. But it’s not as if there isn’t precedent. The NHL changes its overtime rules for the Stanley Cup playoffs, playing overtime the right way. And the NFL now has different overtime rules for its postseason.

Plus, by forcing coaches to keep a timeout in their pockets, it might lead to fewer stoppages along the way.

The NBA has strict standards of what can be reviewed and what can’t.

But the playoffs mean more, which means individual plays mean more.

This isn’t about nitpicking about block-charge. But what if the referee in the TV truck can get a definitive angle that shows the defender in the restricted area on a bang-bang final-seconds play?

To some, the argument is that it would leave much of the process to be determined by the quality of the television production.

As it is, TV dominates the process anyway, be it with the scheduling, the added timeouts, the lengths of the games.

Simply put, the NBA has decided that an extra referee at playoff games is not a luxury, but rather a necessity.

So should be getting the calls right, especially with the added means to do so.

Ira Winderman writes regularly for NBCSports.com and covers the Heat and the NBA for the South Florida Sun-Sentinel. You can follow him on Twitter at http://twitter.com/IraHeatBeat.

  1. frankvzappa - Apr 21, 2011 at 5:12 PM

    how could the refs rig it for David Stern’s preferred outcome if they had to get all the calls right?

  2. icu84bs - May 1, 2011 at 1:00 AM

    I think the NBA already has it right. You can not start reviewing fouls, much like the strike / ball call in baseball, it would slow the game too much.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

The list of championship contenders
Top 10 NBA Player Searches
  1. B. Beal (8120)
  2. K. McDaniels (7649)
  3. R. Rondo (7181)
  4. K. Durant (7098)
  5. L. Sanders (6523)