Mar 26, 2011, 7:00 PM EST
Phil Jackson’s not exactly what you would call a friend to the NBA small market. He played in New York, coached in Chicago and then Los Angeles. He’s supported contraction, despite growing up, attending high school, and college in small market areas, albeit ones without NBA teams. But Jackson has been surprisingly supportive of Sacramento keeping the Kings, and now has come out against a move to Anaheim.
Prior to the Lakers’ game against the Clippers, reporters asked Jackson his thoughts on Anaheim adding a third team to the area market. From the Los Angeles Times:
“What other metropolitan area has three teams in it?” Jackson said rhetorically. “It’s ridiculous to put another franchise in this market. It just doesn’t make sense to do that.
Jackson’s got a pretty good point there. L.A.’s the biggest market, but three teams is pretty ridiculous. Were the team to not be able to pull a big enough portion of fans from the other fanbases, what’s the point of moving it from somewhere that’s already proved it can come out in droves when the team isn’t God-awful.
Unfortunately, the Maloofs are the ones in control of the decision. The only thing standing in their way at this point is their conscience (let’s all laugh out loud) and the other owners who can vote down the move based on their own selfish reasons.
I feel better already.
- PBT Extra: Talking Pacers win over Heat; Aldridge vs. Howard showdown 4
- Kidd says he is reading Frank’s “reports” as details of Nets coaching mess come public 9
- The Extra Pass: The league’s leading lineups; plus Tuesday’s recaps 9
- Tuesday night NBA Grades: Kobe plays pretty well, Suns’ backcourt plays better 10
- Pacers win first Conference Finals rematch vs. Heat 43