Mar 26, 2011, 7:00 PM EDT
Phil Jackson’s not exactly what you would call a friend to the NBA small market. He played in New York, coached in Chicago and then Los Angeles. He’s supported contraction, despite growing up, attending high school, and college in small market areas, albeit ones without NBA teams. But Jackson has been surprisingly supportive of Sacramento keeping the Kings, and now has come out against a move to Anaheim.
Prior to the Lakers’ game against the Clippers, reporters asked Jackson his thoughts on Anaheim adding a third team to the area market. From the Los Angeles Times:
“What other metropolitan area has three teams in it?” Jackson said rhetorically. “It’s ridiculous to put another franchise in this market. It just doesn’t make sense to do that.
Jackson’s got a pretty good point there. L.A.’s the biggest market, but three teams is pretty ridiculous. Were the team to not be able to pull a big enough portion of fans from the other fanbases, what’s the point of moving it from somewhere that’s already proved it can come out in droves when the team isn’t God-awful.
Unfortunately, the Maloofs are the ones in control of the decision. The only thing standing in their way at this point is their conscience (let’s all laugh out loud) and the other owners who can vote down the move based on their own selfish reasons.
I feel better already.
- Could lottery reform be bad for small market teams? Sam Presti argues yes. 0
- LeBron James and his difficult-to-assess super teams 4
- Kevin Durant on return: “I’m not going to rush it all” 6
- ProBasketballTalk 2014-15 preview: Dallas Mavericks 4
- LeBron James: “(The Bulls) are a team that’s much better than us right now just off chemistry” 34
- Has Kobe Bryant cost the Lakers Dwight Howard, Carmelo Anthony, Paul George and others? 80
- Five favorites to win NBA 2014-15 MVP 20
- ProBasketballTalk 2014-15 preview: San Antonio Spurs 7