Comments on: Will Lakers, Clippers oppose Kings relocation to Anaheim?

By: craigw24

craigw24 — Mon, 07 Mar 2011 21:12:06 +0000

I realize we can all argue about the 4 teams we think should contract, but the Griz are actually pretty relevant this year (OKC is a smaller market) and it will be very hard to contract Donald Sterling.

By: heyooooh

heyooooh — Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:12:14 +0000

You can easily make a case to contract at least 4 franchises & no one outside those cities would even notice: Kings, Nets, Grizzles, & Bobcats. I’d throw in the Clippers, Hornets, Hawks (ATL has awful pro sports fans) as the next 3 to go. The NBA has too many teams.

By: ibejeph

ibejeph — Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:30:49 +0000

The Clippers coming to Anaheim made some small amount of sense but the Kings? It is a TERRIBLE idea. Have they done any research into the matter?

I’m an OCite, I grew up with Magic and Worthy on the TV. So did all my friends and most everyone I know. How can they compete with a fanbase which grew up with the purple and gold?

The Maloofs must be angling to be bought out. The NBA bought the Hornets, now they can buy the Kings and liquidate both teams.

By: wfon1

wfon1 — Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:04:32 +0000

how about seattle?

By: loungefly74

loungefly74 — Mon, 07 Mar 2011 14:54:22 +0000

bad move! they will be a vagabond team in LA…no one…no one..will care about them! they need to stay in Sac-town. If they have to move, go to a city that needs or can support an NBA team such as Columbus, Las Vegas, San Jose to name a few…but to add a 3rd team in LA? just bad.