Dec 4, 2010, 9:48 AM EDT
Let us hearken back to those alabaster days when things were simpler, times were happier. When Chris Paul and the Hornets were 8-0, and by golly, CP3 looked like the MVP. A playoff team? No, the question was if New Orleans would have homecourt in the first round! Can they topple the Lakers? Is Emeka Okafor most improved? Is Marco Belinelli the most stylish man in the NBA?
But alas, those days are gone. The mighty Hornets have sucked in routs.
Since that wonderful time, the Hornets are 5-6, losers of their last 5 of 7, and have lots to teams like the Clippers and Knicks (including letting Amar’e Stoudemire work them over like they were paying him to do it). So the Hornets are slumping in a big way. But what’s to be concerned with? I think we all knew this team wasn’t quite that good (those of us whose fandom does not ride floats up a certain street in Louisiana named after a certain county in Kentucky at least). This is simply the reversion to the norm. I’m sure the issues are with Emeka Okafor going back to looking like the same inconsistent, easy to confuse and overwhelm center he’s always been and Marco Belinelli and Willie Green reverting back to form, right?
From Hornets blog At The Hive:
It feels weird to blame Chris Paul at the end of a loss. For more than half a decade, the blame has almost always been rightfully directed elsewhere. But our current offensive woes start and stop with him. On a night the team missed David West, we needed him to step up and take over the scoring load. Instead, he deferred and deferred and deferred until it was far too late. When he did start putting up shots as the game wound down, he scored almost at will. That just makes it so much more exasperating. The overall numbers look fine, but anybody that watched this game will tell you that Chris Paul let the Hornets down.
Yikes. Well, that’s one man’s opinion. What say you, Hornets 24-7?
Normally I refrain from talking too much about Paul since everyone else who writes about the game is going to cover every move and breath he takes, but I can’t help but publicly question his passive play. I don’t want to make any accusations, so I’ll leave it at that.
Sure, with 5 minutes left in the game he decided to take over, but what about the other 43 minutes? Too little, too late.
He finished with 17 points on 9 shots, 10 assists to 2 turnovers, 4 rebounds and 4 steals. The numbers are great, but there need to be more of them under the point category to win games like this.
PAUL HASN’T SCORED 20 POINTS SINCE 11/17. SINCE THEN THE HORNETS ARE 4-5. - I felt like that deserved capitalized bold letters. Paul used to drop 30 once a week just for fun.
Hmmm. It would appear that there may be a batch of bad gin (or jazz or crawfish po’ boys or whatever New Orleans cliche you’d prefer here) going around in New Orleans. It’s hard to figure out exactly what the Hornets have to do to get back to their winning ways, since that early streak was so simply excellent in every regard. They defended well, they attacked well, they rebounded well, they passed well, they shot well. Fixing those things may take rotation changes, it may just take time. Tough one for Monty Williams to figure out.
The Hornets are currently 13-6, three games behind San Antonio for the Southwest Division lead, and in fifth place in the Western Conference. They play San Antonio on Sunday.
- NBA issues statement saying Chris Paul was fouled before late-game turnover against Warriors 0
- Jim Buss says he’ll step down if Lakers aren’t contenders again in ‘three to four years’ 16
- Thunder start fast, cruise to Game 1 win over Grizzlies 3
- Pacers’ troubles continue as Hawks convincingly win Game 1 32
- Warriors take Game 1 from Clippers 30