-
- The Dude Abides - Jun 21, 2010 at 7:35 PM
-
“There’s a real chance Favors will never become a quality offensive player, and an equally real chance that Favors will never become a reliable NBA defender.”
Then why are the Nets even considering Favors over Cousins if he can’t score AND he can’t defend?
-
- Craig W. - Jun 21, 2010 at 7:50 PM
-
I think the 2nd occurrence of Favors name should be Cousins.
-
- The Dude Abides - Jun 21, 2010 at 8:38 PM
-
I know, I just like to nitpick in a dickish way. My other pet peeve is when people type something like “Do you think Lebron will resign” when they actually mean “re-sign.”
-
- jerry25 - Jun 22, 2010 at 8:16 AM
-
Abe Polinsky is not President of the Nets.
It is Gregg Polinsky who is Director of Player Personnel.
And I favor DeMarcus Cousins because 1. Nets also need a backup Center (13 minutes per game), 2. He is more NBA ready and a sure thing 3. He makes the Nets more attractive to LeBron James and 4. Nets wouldn’t have to spend as much for another Big from free agency since DeMarcus could play Big Minutes from the start.
-
- Nick - Jun 22, 2010 at 12:43 PM
-
I think you have to go with Derrick Favors.
With Brook Lopez on the roster, the last thing you need is another unexplosive, athletically challenged big man, who can’t play defense. That’s exactly what Brook Lopez is.
Go for the athletic guy who can defend and play like a real 4.
The Grizzlies have the exact same problem. Both Gasol and Randolph are excellent big men in their own right, and they worked well together for a bit, but they wore down, b/c together, they cant keep up with the more athletic big men in the league. And that’s with one of the most atheletic 3s in the league (Rudy Gay), who could really play the 4 position as well.
And then, I dont even want to talk about the character issues. Modern sports has shown us time and time again that when there are obvious character issues, something bad always happens in the future.