Comments on: NBA Playoffs, Hawks vs. Bucks Game 3: What a difference a venue makes — Bucks win a one off

By: MattC

MattC — Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:08:04 +0000

I think the Bucks were the better team with Bogut healthy. The Hawks just don’t impress me, but then again, as a Cavs fan, we seem to match up very well with them and have a distinct mental edge, so my perspective is admittedly skewed a bit.

By: fuegie

fuegie — Sun, 25 Apr 2010 01:27:07 +0000

How can you be so sure that the bucks can’t win another game ? As much as the hawks dominated in the first 2 games, the bucks had a chance to make it interesting. Everytime the bucks was getting blown out they marched right back and made a game of it until JJ would go un-humanlike. I bet if Bogut was playing, the bucks would’ve taken at least 1 game from the hawks in ATL. Dont be too sure to write off the bucks just yet, althought i’m not saying that the bucks will win the series. They should at least win 1 more game if not bring it to game 7, IMO.

By: fuegie

fuegie — Sun, 25 Apr 2010 01:26:17 +0000

How can you be so sure that the bucks can’t win another game ? As much as the hawks dominated in the first 2 games, the bucks had a chance to make it interesting. Everything the bucks was getting blown out they marched right back and made a game of it until JJ would go un-humanlike. I bet if Bogut was playing, the bucks would’ve taken at least 1 game from the hawks in ATL. Dont be too sure to write off the bucks just yet, althought i’m not saying that the bucks will win the series. They should at least win 1 more game if not bring it to game 7, IMO.