Comments on: No seriously, the Wolves think Darko is part of the answer

By: Matt

Matt — Sun, 28 Mar 2010 12:53:20 +0000

“But if this is what the Wolves consider a big part of their reclamation of the fallen franchise, it’s a risky gamble to take.”
This seems like a fairly large “if” to base an article around. I highly doubt that the Wolves long-term plan begins and ends with Darko.

By: Pat

Pat — Sun, 28 Mar 2010 11:03:37 +0000

What are you talking about?
You are trying too hard to rip the team, no one from the oranization has implied that signing Darko is going to be the key move of the summer, but if he accepts a resonable deal than it’s the right move. If they do sign him to a modest deal all he has to do is provide at least some positive contribution to make the trade with NY a great move, as they gave up literally zero to get him.
When did Jefferson clash with management?
How was their draft a complete bust? Flynn and Ellington both look like nice pieces. A complete bust is a bit strong.
This website sucks compared to PFT, HBT, mostly because of crappy writing like this.

By: bryan

bryan — Sun, 28 Mar 2010 05:56:59 +0000

I dont think they are planning on signing him for a longterm huge contract.
Maybe 2-3 mil per year. if more than that then they are delusional.
they are a terrible team and Darko has been average for them and has helped them in ways that dont show up on stats. Hollins was horrible even though statistically he was not bad. he needs to go and Love and Jefferson dont make up a good front court together.
i can see how this makes sense