<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lakers still laughing off Nuggets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/02/27/lakers-still-laughing-off-nuggets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/02/27/lakers-still-laughing-off-nuggets/</link>
	<description>Basketball - NBC Sports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:42:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave in hillsboro</title>
		<link>http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/02/27/lakers-still-laughing-off-nuggets/comment-page-1/#comment-2074</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dave in hillsboro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcpbt/?p=465#comment-2074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also, this is a baseless statement: &quot;The Denver series was about the least competitive six game series you can have.&quot;
That series was very competitive.  The first, second, third and fifth games were close, with dramatic endings that are not reflected in the final score.  The Nuggets blew the Lakers out in game four, but the game was relatively close until the fourth quarter, in which the Nuggets scored 43 points.  In game six, the Nuggets did get their butts kicked pretty badly, but that was really the only game that was not competitive.  I know this because I watched all of those games more than once, whereas it appears Mr. Moore merely looked at the box scores.
I can think of one six game series that was actually less competitive than the 2009 Western Conference Finals, and yet it was still very competitive and great basketball.  I&#039;m referring to the &#039;98 NBA Finals, in which the Jazz lost game 3 by 42 points.  Equally serviceable as an example would be the 2008 Finals, where the Lakers notoriously lost game six by 39 points.  And yet the 2008 finals were extremely competitive, just as were the 2009 Western Conference Finals.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, this is a baseless statement: &#8220;The Denver series was about the least competitive six game series you can have.&#8221;<br />
That series was very competitive.  The first, second, third and fifth games were close, with dramatic endings that are not reflected in the final score.  The Nuggets blew the Lakers out in game four, but the game was relatively close until the fourth quarter, in which the Nuggets scored 43 points.  In game six, the Nuggets did get their butts kicked pretty badly, but that was really the only game that was not competitive.  I know this because I watched all of those games more than once, whereas it appears Mr. Moore merely looked at the box scores.<br />
I can think of one six game series that was actually less competitive than the 2009 Western Conference Finals, and yet it was still very competitive and great basketball.  I&#8217;m referring to the &#8217;98 NBA Finals, in which the Jazz lost game 3 by 42 points.  Equally serviceable as an example would be the 2008 Finals, where the Lakers notoriously lost game six by 39 points.  And yet the 2008 finals were extremely competitive, just as were the 2009 Western Conference Finals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/02/27/lakers-still-laughing-off-nuggets/comment-page-1/#comment-2073</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 02:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcpbt/?p=465#comment-2073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you mean &quot;Andrew Bynum&quot; and not &quot;Josh Powell&quot; because I didn&#039;t  see Josh being quoted anywhere in that story, but Bynum was saying something about it being a statement game for the Lakers.
I think as a matter of professional courtesy the Lakers should be giving the Nuggets props. Its true that the Nuggets were crazy on fire in the February 5 game, but the Lakers had plenty of opportunities to step up their defense in that game and apparently decided it was too much of a hassle.
Your last statement is spot-on. The Lakers have earned the right to say whatever they want to say. And in a seven-game series between the two, the Lakers come away winners again. There is just too much talent on one team, and too much emotion on the other one.
MT, you are certainly right about Matt on his previous posting. (See my responses.) I will give Matt the benefit of the doubt on this one. He is bringing up legitimate points on the Lakers here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you mean &#8220;Andrew Bynum&#8221; and not &#8220;Josh Powell&#8221; because I didn&#8217;t  see Josh being quoted anywhere in that story, but Bynum was saying something about it being a statement game for the Lakers.<br />
I think as a matter of professional courtesy the Lakers should be giving the Nuggets props. Its true that the Nuggets were crazy on fire in the February 5 game, but the Lakers had plenty of opportunities to step up their defense in that game and apparently decided it was too much of a hassle.<br />
Your last statement is spot-on. The Lakers have earned the right to say whatever they want to say. And in a seven-game series between the two, the Lakers come away winners again. There is just too much talent on one team, and too much emotion on the other one.<br />
MT, you are certainly right about Matt on his previous posting. (See my responses.) I will give Matt the benefit of the doubt on this one. He is bringing up legitimate points on the Lakers here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MT</title>
		<link>http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/02/27/lakers-still-laughing-off-nuggets/comment-page-1/#comment-2072</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcpbt/?p=465#comment-2072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another no-talent hack making a living off of dragging in Laker fans with misleading headlines only to ambush them with unprofessional bias. Look over your writing the next time &quot;Matt&quot;, and try to portray the flaws in each teams outlook equally. Not that I don&#039;t understand you&#039;re obviously playing the antagonist for hits (like a million other posers who have faded into the blog ethers); in the long run basing your &quot;career&quot; on such a singular schtick won&#039;t succeed. Who do you think you are, the next Hollinger, or Snapper Jones? Remember his Laker hating as they ran off three championships in his face? &quot;They gonna lose to Portland. They gonna lose to Sactown. They gonna lose to etc.&quot; You&#039;re nothing special if this is your angle. Last time I click on anything you write - you duped me once, shame on you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another no-talent hack making a living off of dragging in Laker fans with misleading headlines only to ambush them with unprofessional bias. Look over your writing the next time &#8220;Matt&#8221;, and try to portray the flaws in each teams outlook equally. Not that I don&#8217;t understand you&#8217;re obviously playing the antagonist for hits (like a million other posers who have faded into the blog ethers); in the long run basing your &#8220;career&#8221; on such a singular schtick won&#8217;t succeed. Who do you think you are, the next Hollinger, or Snapper Jones? Remember his Laker hating as they ran off three championships in his face? &#8220;They gonna lose to Portland. They gonna lose to Sactown. They gonna lose to etc.&#8221; You&#8217;re nothing special if this is your angle. Last time I click on anything you write &#8211; you duped me once, shame on you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j. d. hastings</title>
		<link>http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/02/27/lakers-still-laughing-off-nuggets/comment-page-1/#comment-2071</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[j. d. hastings]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 19:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcpbt/?p=465#comment-2071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While, as a Laker fan, I do worry about the Lakers&#039; attitude towards Denver- and feel that Denver could win a 7 game series whether LA takes them seriously or not- I worry a lot more about how that attitude shows on the court than in what they say.
I take the quotes from each these last two posts as not being much to get worked up over.  These are public comments from people on a team.  They will obviously advocate their chosen position over saying God&#039;s objective truth.  The Lakers HAVE to tell themselves that the last 2 beat downs were nothing special, and Phil Jackson&#039;s needling has never been about internal consistency (check everything he&#039;s ever said about officiating and shaq before, during and after he&#039;s coached him).  It&#039;s smarmy, but like an attorney, he&#039;s doing his job.
You&#039;re doing your job calling BS when you see it too, but I don&#039;t think any of us really expect anybody in sports to act otherwise.  Which is what makes the occasional exception, like Popovich, so enjoyable.
so Long as the Lakers treat the Nuggets respectfully without showing them up on the court I&#039;m not nearly so worried about what they say than about the talent of the Nuggets.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While, as a Laker fan, I do worry about the Lakers&#8217; attitude towards Denver- and feel that Denver could win a 7 game series whether LA takes them seriously or not- I worry a lot more about how that attitude shows on the court than in what they say.<br />
I take the quotes from each these last two posts as not being much to get worked up over.  These are public comments from people on a team.  They will obviously advocate their chosen position over saying God&#8217;s objective truth.  The Lakers HAVE to tell themselves that the last 2 beat downs were nothing special, and Phil Jackson&#8217;s needling has never been about internal consistency (check everything he&#8217;s ever said about officiating and shaq before, during and after he&#8217;s coached him).  It&#8217;s smarmy, but like an attorney, he&#8217;s doing his job.<br />
You&#8217;re doing your job calling BS when you see it too, but I don&#8217;t think any of us really expect anybody in sports to act otherwise.  Which is what makes the occasional exception, like Popovich, so enjoyable.<br />
so Long as the Lakers treat the Nuggets respectfully without showing them up on the court I&#8217;m not nearly so worried about what they say than about the talent of the Nuggets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
